What's more annoying?

Patrick Duffy · #1 02-15-2005, 06:28 PM

a player who goes all-in for 1300 when there are 70 chips in the pot?

or

a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?

Bigwig · #2 02-15-2005, 06:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
a player who goes all-in for 1300 when there are 70 chips in the pot?

or

a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

Minimum bettors.

Pokerscott · #3 02-15-2005, 06:54 PM

[ QUOTE ]
a player who goes all-in for 1300 when there are 70 chips in the pot?

or

a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

A guy to your right that steals as much as you want to...

raptor517 · #4 02-15-2005, 06:55 PM

spot on. min betters.

Mr_J · #5 02-15-2005, 06:57 PM

minraisers are worse...

gr8vertical · #6 02-15-2005, 07:29 PM

I guess the first one, because I never min. raise [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

lorinda · #7 02-15-2005, 07:31 PM

a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?

This is usually what I want him to do [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Lori

citanul · #8 02-15-2005, 07:53 PM

Why would either of these annoy you?

In my ongoing, but infrequent attempt to make the forum more valuable by harassing people who post stupid things, I ask you to please consider your post, and try to figure out if there was any value to it at all. In specific, was there any way that anyone was supposed to "get anything" out of your post, youreelf included?

citanul

Phoenix1010 · #9 02-15-2005, 07:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
A guy to your right that steals as much as you want to...

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.