#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
Ok, perhaps just a cry for a pep talk here. But after playing my first 100 SNGs at pokerroom $10+1 I had done pretty well, ITM and ROI both almost 50%. Now, I haven't really changed the way I play but have dumped 21 games in a row. Best finish in any of them, 5th. Did I forget how to play or is it mean reversion? Thanks in advance.
Spots |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
21 in a row seems like alot,but most would agree this could be normal variance.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
I dumped 12 in a row today after a 40 % ROI over the last week.
Normal variance... I hope. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
A lot of it may just be variance, although your sample size is small. However, 21 OOTM is a big streak. Are you sure you're not tilting?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
Look over hand histories and be honest.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
I had AA and KK busted in 5 of the tournies today... so I think that had a lot to do with it for me.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
Let me be geeky for a moment and throw in an explanation of mean regression, because you clearly have the wrong idea.
Mean regression does not mean that you can expect to have a bad run after a good one, so it all "evens out". Assuming independent random trials (for simplicity, I know this is not wholly accurate, so save the flames [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ), a run of 10, 100, or 1000 wins in a row has no effect on the likelihood that you'll win next time. Regression to the mean is really an expression of how your results smooth out over time after a large number of trials. Let's say your ROI is 25%, but you happen to win your first 20 tourneys in a row. Your mean result will be way off from your "true" ROI for a long time. But if you then play 10000 tourneys that average out to roughly your true ROI rate, those first 20 will have a negligible effect on your overall average, and your mean result will come closer and closer to your true ROI. It's just the tendency of a large number of trials to overwhelm short term spikes. Nothing more. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
U better hope that Irieguy is in a good mood when he reads this [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
21 OOTM in a row is A LOT. Where's that thread that predicts how often a 45% ITM player will lose 12 in a row? I dunno, but it's not very often. Perhaps you went on a great card run, got over-aggressive. Did you say this is your first 100 games ever?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mean reversion or have I forgotten how to play?
No, not first 100 games ever, just first 100 since I started keeping track of it with the spreadsheet posted on the site a couple of times. Could be I got a bit more aggressive, but my current bad streak is spread over a two week period which I would hope would mitigate possible tilting.
|
|
|