Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2005, 02:58 PM
Q8offsuit Q8offsuit is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Dirty Nati
Posts: 0
Default More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

Seems like the HOF voters neglect all-time great pitchers (esp. closers) and quickly usher in borderline position players.

Bert Blyleven, for example? Why the hell is he not in the HOF?

Retired THIRD on career strikeouts list with 3,701. Currently fifth.

Only thirteen wins short of 300.

242 Complete Games. 60 shutouts.

Pitched a no-hitter.

Won 2 World Series with a 2-1 record, 2.35 ERA.
3-0 in the LCS.

Negatives: Only won 20 games once (20-17 in 1973). Lost 250 games.
All the strikeouts came at the expense of a lot of HRs, especially near the end of his career.

3.31 Lifetime ERA is a little high, but compares favorably with Carlton (3.22), Ryan (3.19), Early Wynn (3.54), and some other HOF pitchers.

Very, very solid pitcher who is not in and does not seem to be close. I say 3,700 strikouts gets you in. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:15 PM
Patrick del Poker Grande Patrick del Poker Grande is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

GET HIM IN THERE!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:39 PM
dabluebery dabluebery is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 13
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

I think the credibility in the strikeouts is meaningless, but that doesn't make Blylven a bad candidate. On the contrary, I think he's perhaps the most glaring example of a pitcher who should be in the Hall of Fame, but is not, for whatever reason.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:55 PM
M2d M2d is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: california
Posts: 660
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

he was never considered the best at his position during his time in the league.
I don't necessarily think that Blylevin doesn't belong wrt other inductees, but I do think that a lot of people in there don't belong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:59 PM
RogerZBT RogerZBT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 63
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

Blyleven comes down to 'good, not great.' His era is good, not great. He led the league in losses once, but never in wins. He's third in K's, but again, never led the league. But probably the biggest knock is he was basically a .500 pitcher, with a 287-250 record. That's an average 13-11 over his 22 years. Yes, the team he played for had something to do with that, but it's still a very hard sell for the voters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2005, 04:20 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

Blyleven is one of those players who I think should clearly be in compared to those already in, but I would prefer the HOF would have never put many of those players in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2005, 04:34 PM
jesusarenque jesusarenque is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 470
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

Blylevin should defnitely be in. His exclusion is one of the biggest oversights, with Ron Santo being the biggest. It is a joke Santo is not in.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:25 PM
dabluebery dabluebery is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 13
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

Black Ink: Pitching - 16 (128) (Average HOFer ~ 40)
Gray Ink: Pitching - 239 (23) (Average HOFer ~ 185)
HOF Standards: Pitching - 50.0 (36) (Average HOFer ~ 50)
HOF Monitor: Pitching - 120.5 (67) (Likely HOFer > 100)
Overall Rank in parentheses.

Act.- Denotes rank among active players, Car. - Denotes career rank
Click on the Car, Act or Year to see the career, active, or league leaderboard.


Similar Pitchers View in Pop-up
Don Sutton (914) *
Gaylord Perry (909) *
Fergie Jenkins (890) *
Tommy John (889)
Robin Roberts (876) *
Tom Seaver (864) *
Jim Kaat (854)
Early Wynn (844) *
Phil Niekro (844) *
Steve Carlton (840) *

Just based on a quick look at the numbers, it's pretty clear to me that he belongs in the hall of fame. These scores are from baseball-reference.com.

Agree, it's a separate argument that maybe many of these pitchers don't belong.... but in comparison to pitchers already there.... he's better than a lot of them. Read Rob Neyer.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:38 PM
RogerZBT RogerZBT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 63
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

What site are you getting those numbers from?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-02-2005, 06:04 PM
MrFeelNothin MrFeelNothin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: drawing to a draw
Posts: 178
Default Re: More on HOF - Why Not Blyleven?

I dont think it makes a lot of sense to compare ERAs of pitchers who pitched in completely different eras. But I digress......what Blylevens case comes down to is the fact that he was never at any point in his career one of the best pitchers in the league. Also, pretty much any impressive stat he has is due only to his incredibly long career. As pointed out he only won 20 games once, lost 10 or more 15 times, gave up 430 HRs and he never came close to winning a Cy Young.

I'm a lifelong Twins fan and I do have to say that if he was a good guy and an ambassador for the sport my answer might change. But as it is he is a complete [censored] and can never resist plugging his HOF credentials into every Twins broadcast. You're not fooling us Bert, you were good but nothing special.

For anyone that disagrees, go to mlb.com and go to stats-historical. Pull up the year by year list of leaders in various pitching categories. See how often you can spot Berts name.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.