#1
|
|||
|
|||
Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
Hi all... while I sit at my mundane job, awaiting a government security clearance, I found myself wanting to work on my programming skills. I started to read about Poker Tracker and was very interested in making something like this.
After a few weeks of writing and testing code, I have a preliminary version of such a product that works for UB, and soon Party Poker. I really wanted to know what kind of statistics everyone is looking for in a software package. I am pretty much using all of the statistics (for individuals, and by starting hand) that PT uses, and am starting features for finding stats on flopping OES-draws and Flush draws, and other fancy stuff. Also, the database that stores the information is a central mySQL server, which makes this quite a powerful tool if multiple people are inputting hands into it. What would you all like to see in a poker hand history stats software? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
I'd like to know how often a player sees the flop, not just VPIP.
I also have another comment for you. Does MySQL now support foreign keys and sub searches, because at one point I know they didn't. Would that not make development a bit of a hassle? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
This isn't really about statistics, but if you make something that works for Omaha/8 on Party you'll have an instantly viable product, even if only rudimentary features are available.
The MySQL-backed approach seems desirable, especially if you can thereby avoid the 100,000 hand limit of PokerTracker. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
That it stores stats for non-HE games. Stud, stud/8, omaha, omaha/8 would be awesome. I don't need all the depth of PT, just the basic stats.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
I haven't seen anything like PT in a Palm or other handheld format. I'd love to have something that I could create hand histories and stats with when I play live. Even if I could just record the hands when I'm playing and then download them into a desktop application for further review would be great.
Shauna |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
something that kept track of basic stats for stud or omaha would be great. even if it only kept track of wins/losses, and rake paid it would still be great. if you can accomplish something like that you could make a pretty penny...
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
PT fills a big niche and it fills it very well. I don't see the point in replicating the huge amount of work that Pat has done.
But the suggestion of supporting Stud or Omaha is a great one. You will get a huge response if you supported these, and it would definitely make the games more popular here. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
I'm really not out to be competition... my original intentions were to just work on my own programming. I haven't played a lot of stud and Omaha... I would have to check on the rules for those games to get the right statistics, but I wouldnt see how it'd be hard to set up.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
I don't know about foreign keys, but sub searches are available. For what I've done so far, a lot of the super complex SQL statements aren't totally necessary... I've been doing a lot of the statistics from PHP code, using loops and arrays... all of the stats will be dynamically created.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Developing Software like PT - Any suggestions?
Well, I'm not saying that you're out for competition, but a niche is a niche, and it would take an incredible amount of work to offer a product as useful for Hold'em as PT is. And it would take most people several months to equal PT + a basic knowledge of excel.
However, if you were to work on games that PT doesn't support, you'd get immediate positive feedback, possible monetary support and a real novel product. I recommend not replicating PT for the same reason I recommend not replicating MS Word. Why bother? There are clearly needs that people will hail you for. |
|
|