#1
|
|||
|
|||
ICM Question
Noob question. I have seen this term used some, but I don't know wha tit means.
Anyone care to enlighten me? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
The Independent Chip Model is a model that seeks to predict the percentage share in the prize pool of all remaining players, based on their chip amounts. Its limitations are that it assumes everyone plays the same and that it does not take into account how playing power varies with stack size (e.g. having a big stack on the bubble).
There's a calculator here. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
Is there a formula available anywhere? I would like to be able to calculate it myself. In particular, I am looking at combining it with the twodimes.net type calculations, to get $EV in addition to CEV.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
That seems to be the million dollar question.
I actually thought I had a pretty good handle on how exactly ICM calculations were achieved until I tried to answer a thread asking this very question. After an hour of trying to derive an exact formula or prodedure to get ICM results, I gave up because mine never matched up with the ICM calculator. I would also very much like to know the answer to this question. I've seen the links in the dethgrind thread and have seen the coding, but it all means little to me. Regards Brad S |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
I think it's fairly complex. My dad's a math Ph.D. and he doesn't seem to think that it's trivial.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
The formula is basic, just very time-consuming to use if you have lots of players.
For example, for three players, A (5000 chips), B (3000), C (2000), prize money $250, $ 150, $100 Possible results: ABC ACB BAC BCA CAB CBA Take A's chance of winning first (5000 / total chips in play = 50%). He can come 1st one of two ways (either B or C comes second). B comes second 60% of the time (3000 / remaining chips (which is 3000 + 2000), meaning C comes second 40% of the time which is (2000 / (2000 + 3000)). So you then have a % chance of these two possibilities (ABC is 50% x 60% = 30% & ACB is 50% x 40% = 20%), then repeat for other possible outcomes. Total up the % chance of each player in each position & multiply by the prize money to calculate $EV. Never done it 'manually' for four players & upwards though, which is where it gets time-consuming.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
[ QUOTE ]
That seems to be the million dollar question. [/ QUOTE ] Someone has to know this code, right? Who came up with the original ICM stuff, was it Bozeman? Eastbay? What would be really cool is if there was an application that followed chip counts and your hand in real time from your table(s) and all you had to do was plug in the range you felt your opponent had in order to get CEV and $EV figures for calling allins. I suppose if you could hook that up you could probably also create an algorithm to use some sort of range of calling hands for opponents behind you when open pushing and it could calculate your $EV in that situation too based on how likely you'd run into calling hands and such. Of course, this is really close to bot territory I suppose but it'd still be a pretty sweet tool for making your decision. Does everyone just still use something like Pokercalc or Pokerstove after the fact to calculate CEV of your hand vs. range of hands, tally up the chip counts that result from a fold or push and then plug that into ICM? Yugoslav |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] That seems to be the million dollar question. [/ QUOTE ] Someone has to know this code, right? Who came up with the original ICM stuff, was it Bozeman? Eastbay? [/ QUOTE ] I wrote the code that drives dethgrind's web page. I'm not sure what more there is to say about it other than what's already been said in prior threads, or what the code itself says. I certainly didn't invent the idea and neither did Bozeman. eastbay |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
I know that many people have written their own versions of these and I have one for 3 and 4 player scenarios that works pretty well for situations like the one dethgrind posted about link. If you, or anyone else, would like to have a look then let me know and I will forward it to you.
Regards, Dave S |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ICM Question
Thanks, that's an excellent explanation
Regards Brad S |
|
|