|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Are you male or female? | |||
| Male |
   
|
34 | 100.00% |
| Female |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
01-06-2005, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
Note, this is not about 2+2 moderating the content hosted on its website. this is obviously legit, as the 2+2 name is all over the place here, and content placed on these boards could reflect on the brand. This is solely to guage the reaction of OOTopia when posed the following question....
peace john nickle 
|
|
#2
01-06-2005, 06:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
Noone should have to cater to a small crowd becuase they want to view this board during the time they should be working. You can turn off all avatars, or you can view the opera fan club message board for those w/ vaginas.
|
|
#5
01-06-2005, 06:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
I don't care at all about semi nude women, or avatars. Semi nude won't get me in trouble and I can block avatars. but nudity just ain't cool. Posting a link takes as much time and effort as posting a pic.
|
|
#6
01-06-2005, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't care at all about semi nude women, or avatars. Semi nude won't get me in trouble and I can block avatars. but nudity just ain't cool. Posting a link takes as much time and effort as posting a pic. [/ QUOTE ] Agree 100% there is a line and that is it.
|
|
#7
01-06-2005, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
Note: this poll should not include discussions of nudity. nudity does not belong on this forum. Postin naked chicks is not only, i think, an offense which will get you banned, but also opens up a host of legal issues that 2+2 probably doesnt want to deal with. NO NUDITY!!!
peace john nickle
|
|
#8
01-06-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
NSFW posts/threads should be clearly labeled as such, and people at work should browse with avatars turned off, or with graphics disabled entirely. Or they can browse in threaded mode and avoid threads/posts tagged NSFW. It's really not up to us to make a free-wheeling gambling website safe for people at work or with children, in my opinion. Of course, I could be totallay biased, as I am at home right now and have no children as far as I know.
|
|
#9
01-06-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
I really don't see how that right there is to much to ask either. [censored], there might even be people on here who don't want porn on their home computer(not me of course), but still.
|
|
#10
01-06-2005, 06:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tailoring 2+2 to make it work-friendly?
[ QUOTE ]
Note: this poll should not include discussions of nudity. nudity does not belong on this forum. Postin naked chicks is not only, i think, an offense which will get you banned, but also opens up a host of legal issues that 2+2 probably doesnt want to deal with. NO NUDITY!!! peace john nickle [/ QUOTE ] oh, no nudity then at all, then whats the point of this.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
