#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad luck?
Hey guys,
Over the last few months, I have noticed that I barely EVER flop sets on party poker. So I went through poker tracker and found every time that I flopped a set, boat, or quads with a pocket pair. I wrote up a summary compared to paradise. My sample size is not great, but when I only flop 31 sets in 13,166 hands, something is wrong! Party True Stats • Total Pocket Pairs: 720 • Set or better off flop: 31 of 720 PP • Total Hands, sets: 31 of 13,166 total hands. Projected Odds (Should be flopping a set or better with a PP) • Total Pocket Pairs: 775 • 85 of 720 Sets or better • 90 of 775 Sets or better I should have flopped 90 sets in 13,166 hands. I should have flopped 85 sets with the number of Pocket pairs I have received. Bottom Line: I’m flopping 1/3 the amount of sets I’m supposed to. Paradise True Stats • Total Pocket Pairs:1,516 • Set or better off flop: 162 of 1,516 PP • Total Hands, sets: 162 of 25,858 Projected Odds • Total Pocket Pairs: 1,520 • 177 of 1,516 sets or better • 178 of 1,520 sets or better I should have flopped 178 sets or better in 25,858 hands. I should have flopped 177 sets with the number of Pocket pairs I have received. Bottom Line: My actual odds are very close to projected on paradise. Mabye this is why I'm winning 0.91(PT)BB/100 on party and 10(PT)BB/100 on paradise..... Has anyone else experienced this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad luck?
us discussing this is stupid b/c everyone knows the generators are random.....but i have played about 2,000 hands on a certain site and and i swear the only pp i ever had hit a set on the flop went like this:
6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (heads up) Flop: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Turn: J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] River: 9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and the other guy had QQ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad luck?
yeah I know its random...
I guess my real question is this: How big of an effect does this have on my winrate. I feel that becuase of this, I am barely above even on party, as sets make up a majority of anyone's profit. Am I off on this? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad luck?
Do sets really make up a majority of most people's profit? Personally, I have made most of my money on two pair. I make more ON AVERAGE from sets, but two pair occurs much more frequently, so . . .
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad luck?
[ QUOTE ]
us discussing this is stupid b/c everyone knows the generators are random.....but i have played about 2,000 hands on a certain site and and i swear the only pp i ever had hit a set on the flop went like this: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (heads up) Flop: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Turn: J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] River: 9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and the other guy had QQ [/ QUOTE ] Wow. Like 10 minutes after i post that i get 3 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] in the BB. Pot is raised once and we're 3 handed to the flop. Flop: 3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] yeah so long story short i go all in and the other guy turns over 9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] this kind of crap make anyone suspicious if you saw it all the time? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad lu
[ QUOTE ]
Do sets really make up a majority of most people's profit? Personally, I have made most of my money on two pair. I make more ON AVERAGE from sets, but two pair occurs much more frequently, so . . . [/ QUOTE ] in 20,000 hands of NL25 and 50 I'm +$1,730 with three of a kind and -$141.20 with two pair... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad lu
I think that answers my question....
I'm only up about $800 with trips in 15K hands of NL100!!! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad luck?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] us discussing this is stupid b/c everyone knows the generators are random.....but i have played about 2,000 hands on a certain site and and i swear the only pp i ever had hit a set on the flop went like this: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (heads up) Flop: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Turn: J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] River: 9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and the other guy had QQ [/ QUOTE ] Wow. Like 10 minutes after i post that i get 3 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] in the BB. Pot is raised once and we're 3 handed to the flop. Flop: 3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] yeah so long story short i go all in and the other guy turns over 9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] this kind of crap make anyone suspicious if you saw it all the time? [/ QUOTE ] yeah |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad luck?
yes. where "all the time" = sample of 100K+ hands.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rediculous flaw in party software.... Or extremly prolonged bad lu
Guess I'm the lucky two pair maestro.
|
|
|