|
|
#1
11-14-2004, 04:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Calling $2 (all in) into a $150 pot.
I was not involved in this hand, but it happened last night at commerce. I thought it was pretty funny, but some other players didnt think so. My recollection isnt perfect.
$100nl 2/3 blinds. EP ~$600 MP ~$200 CO ~$52 Preflop: EP raises to 10. MP calls. CO calls. Flop: 5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] EP leads out for $30. MP and CO call Turn: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] EP bets $10 and says something about practically putting CO all in. MP calls and EP realizes that he gave MP excellent odds to call and says "oh man, you call too now you get to see a cheap river". CO calls River: 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Pairs the board and completes the flush. EP checks. MP moves all in. CO calls for $2 (all in) and EP folds. MP folds before CO reveals his cards My question is, whats the worst possible holding that CO can call $2 with into such a large pot. Can he call with 32o and hope that his opponent is playing the board? Can he call with bottom pair? Or maybe even pocket 2s? Table talk to follow, if theres any interest. 
|
|
#4
11-14-2004, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Calling $2 (all in) into a $150 pot.
He had 2 dollars left because thats what he was left with after the previous bet.
People were upset because MP made a bet that folded out the winning hand, when he didnt even have a hand to show down himself. If there was a sidepot that he was trying to protect, of course this would have been okay. But some felt that because there was no chance he could fold out CO, that he shouldnt have bet. Someone mentioned that it could look like collusion, someone betting to fold out a better hand, so his partner scoops the pot, though i dont think anyone seriously thought they were colluding
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
