#1
|
|||
|
|||
How good is this advice??
Any comments from the experts?? Heads-Up Poker Limit Holdem After thinking about what to write on this issue, I came to the conclusion that it would take at least a book for each particular game. This would be a great endeavor and would take a lot of time on my part. But as I say, "you have to start somewhere". The games that most of the people on RGP are most familiar with is Holdem. The weakest part of 99.99% of the players in the world is their heads-up game or short handed game. Basically three or less is short to me, though many consider the number to be 5. We will be dealing with heads-up play, my specialty, in all shapes, forms and sizes. Let me give you a small out-line about heads-up poker. The best players will dominate in a fairly short period of time. The best player will choose "pot limit' as their choice, since it is the most skillful way to play all these flop games. It is also the most skillful way to play 7 card stud also, 7 card stud high-low and Razz. Draw poker should be played in a No-lomit style, being it high or low. However, with proper ante structure and blinds, draw poker can easily be played in a limit format. The only game that really deserves to be played NO LIMIT is 5 card stud [no stripped deck]. This is a game where the best players can play for months at a time and not lose. On with the lesson for today. We will start with Limit Holdem, heads-up. First let me explain to you that people that are not excellent players will have a hard time understanding many of the concepts that I state. Concept one is this; you can play every hand in heads-up holdem and crush an opponent who is not as good as you. In fact, it may not be a bad idea to even play every hand against anyone, including WCP's. The main thing about heads-up play is the aggression and the control of the betting. People that play heads up make decisions that are lightning fast. Speed kills in this situation and the faster you can play and comprehend the situation the larger your advantage is over your opposition. A period of no longer than 50 hours should determine the best player in this game, no matter how lucky the individual is. Normally it would not take this long. Now I know you are asking the question already; how can you play every hand and win? I pose this question to you, what are you going to do with an opponent that raises every pot on the button and calls every raise when you have the button? Obviously we are not talking about idiots here. A person that sits and waits for a hand, like he is in a ring game, will soon find out he has lost numerous buy-ins in blinds. To fight a person who plays every hand, you must do the same thing. Swings will be very great, but the person who bets the best and reads the opponent the best will come out with all the chips. Think of heads up in this manner. What would happen if the game was played with the cards turned over, face up. Wouldn't some one want to bet on every card? Obviously if they turned their cards face up, you could see the advantage and thus bet. Some one would definitely bet every time. Same can be said when the cards are face down. When there is not a bet on one of the streets, either the person is setting up a check and raise for a double bet or someone is losing a bet with the best hand. The idea of the game is to realize when you have the best hand. Now this can't be done every time or even close to every time. However, to beat the opposition, all you have to do is be able to recognize when you have the best hand more often than he does. Not that difficult if you know what you are doing. Main thing of playing heads up is the control of the betting. Now, controlling the betting does not necessarily mean you have to bet every time. The concept of this is that when you want the money in the pot, it gets into the pot, and when you don't, there is no bet. It's that simple. But to accomplish this, it takes great skills. To begin with when playing heads-up, you determine the type of opposition you are facing. Is he aggressive, super aggressive, passive, tight, or will he battle every hand with you until the finish. Here is where the skill really comes in. The best player has more styles for offense and defense than you can possibly imagine. He can stop on a dime and accelerate to light speed in a split second. One thing you have to remember about heads up poker. You are not betting on making your hand. You are betting on the opposition NOT making a hand. Totally different from the way your understanding of the game has been taught to you. Random cards are what they are, random cards. Playing every hand is a reality you would face against many of the best limit holdem players in the world. How you play them is the difference. Obviously NO ONE can have a hand every time in poker. Here is where the jousting begins. Betting and raising, the key to controlling the game, in almost all situations. Here is the difference. Say you are both playing every hand. Say the hands come out with each winning the same amount, as theoretically it should, should you go to the end. Obviously the one that out bets the other will win the money. One of the keys here is not to make any pot too much different than any other pot. Put the same value on all of them. The winnings will be the times you get the opponent to give you a free card and the times you value bet him to get an extra bet. But it is not a perfect world and the cards don't break even. In heads-up, it really doesn't matter. The best players have so big an edge it is really incredible. For an experiment, try this one day. Raise the pot every time on the button when playing heads up. Check every time after the flop. Bet or raise every time on fourth street. See what your results are. In fact, try without looking at your cards, just don't let the opposition know you are doing this. See if they can adapt. Realize that any one that waits for a hand in a heads up situation will lose many blinds while waiting. Also, when he gets involved in betting, the opposition will know he has some thing and will be waiting to check- raise him and trap him, or let him win the minimum. Heads-up players that win, bet their own hands, they don't bet yours. You have to learn to do this yourself. Object of the game is to get the money called when you have the best of it and have free cards given to you with the worse of it. I wrote a post a while back called the rule of 7. This applies greatly in this game of limit heads-up holdem. Heads-up, is not a game for callers. callers will go broke quicker than they can pull the money out of their pockets. Feeler bets, those made on the flop, will give you some kind of information about the oppositions hand. Check raising is a major part of this game. Check raising with nothing is a major part of this game. This is why I have written that post about the rule of seven. In heads up, you must be prepared to bet with nothing as many times the plays are going to be nothing against nothing, with the one that does the betting the best winning the pot. Remember, the game of heads up poker is not to make hands. The game is betting your opposition is not making hands. Here is where position comes into play. As a rule of thumb, never 3 bet on the big blind in heads up holdem. As a rule of thumb never 4 bet on the button in heads up holdem. Think about what I just stated. Any one who three bets on the big button, will come out betting on the flop as he has already told you he wanted to establish dominance in the hand. He will come out swinging to either try and steal or continue with the play the hand he is representing. Either way, no matter what you have or had, you are setting him up. If you had Aces on the button, and did raise, and were reraised, do you think it would be smart to make it four bets? You are setting the victim up to bluff the pot or trap himself. Patience please. Same thing goes if you have Aces on the big blind and get raised. By calling, you are not telling the opposition anything and know he will attempt to steal it after the flop if he hasn't a hand or will bet it if he does have a hand. Here is where the trapping comes into play. Besides, I have told you that the object in limit is not to make any hands much different than other hands. Not having the opposition able to read your style is the difference between winning and losing. The key, is being able to have so many different styles that the opposition doesn't know how to combat it. All heads up players are aggressive. But in a horse race, the speed of the speed is the one to fear. However, do you always want to be the speed, if the pace of the game is fast enough? The answer is no. The name of the game is knowing how to bet to get the most information about a players hand. Sometimes it is best to lay off the pace and punish him in the last quarter of a mile, meaning the river. Remember, many things are a given in heads-up poker, just as in ring game poker. Expect a person who raises on the button to expect to bet when the flop comes high cards. Also expect that he is going to bet no matter what in this situation, or check to make you think he is sand bagging. Then when you check on fourth street, he comes out betting, knowing you have the image in your mind that he was trying to trap you. Remember, there are no gimmees. Playing poker means playing poker. Learning to adapt is the key to heads up play. The pot must be the right size that it is supposed to be when you win it. If it is over what it is supposed to be, give your self a high five as your opponent shall soon fall. Key to success at limit heads up holdem, is make all pots about the same as if you hold aces or a 7-2 off suit. By this I mean don't make the pots so big that it takes four or five to get the money back. Never underestimate the opposition. Better to over estimate him and adjust later on. For if you have to adjust, he is yours any way. Speed in playing is very beneficial to heads-up. Same as in many sporting events. Many opponents don't have the computer chips able to process the information as well as the best player. The faster you play, and I don't mean by betting or raising, but by making the moves, the less information the opposition gets to absorb. Some people will say they are tells, but this is BULLSHIT. It is a sense of how long the opposition takes to respond. It can only be a nano second, but it is not a tell. It is a gift for only the ones that have really paid attention to poker. A tell is some one who picks his nose when he has the nuts, or doesn't when he is bluffing. All these MORONS tell you they picked up a tell, but they never tell you what it is. I state, THEY ARE JUST GUESSING, and some of the time they have to be right. Just remember, the ones that are always in the position of calling are the ones that will lose. Yes, tells do exist, but not with WCP. If you never called and always lost your money betting, you would be far better off. As long as the decision is in the other corner, you are in control. You determine the percentage of bluffs and the percentage of times you are betting with the best hand. When they state they have picked up a tell in the high limits of professional poker, it is a bluff to vindicate why they called. Have you seen their hands when they call and they lose? If you had that information, then you could make an accurate analysis. The rule of the game is this, those who are calling will soon be losing. It takes a certain skill to even be in a position to have the opposition calling you all the time. If they are capable of doing this, they are capable of adjusting to less bluffing and having the opposition calling more with the worst hand. The edge is always with the bettor. For he can have the best hand, or the others may fold. This will be an ongoing series where I will answer sensible questions posed to me. I am not a writer. I do know one thing however, though I may not write well, I can outplay any writer that has ever lived. This has taken me many hours to write and I am getting tired. Sometimes I am in better spirits [get it, Dom Perignon] than other times [Moet Chandon]. But I am here to show you and let you be the judge. Math in heads-up, you be the judge. I am decent in math and most subjects. Far from the idiot these people tried to portray me as when I came on line. Remember, I do this for free, which may not be the brightest thing to do, but I have never claimed to be the most intelligent. I have claimed to be the best poker player, however. I will be writing about heads-up poker quite frequently from now on. I will go into all games, limit, pot limit and the rest. Patience please and feel free to ask questions. I must get at least 20 e mails a day when I am coming out with a book. I really don't care. I do this for free to have you people realize I am what I am [Popeye] and if it takes this to convince you who is the one telling the truth, so be it. Doesn't it amaze you that I get attacked by individuals that have literally no knowledge on the subjects I am writing. Where are the one that have some knowledge. In my pocket haha Russ G newgca@aol.com this will be a series about heads-up next will be heads-up pot limit holdem want to play |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
Hey JAque, i'm a beginner low limit hold'em ring game player interested in improving my heads-up play against my opponents. I'm just now learning the importance of re-raising with my big suited connectors to isolate my opponents and to get it heads-up. I play tight and think i should have an advantage against my looser or atleast hopefully weaker calling station opponents. I'm very competitive, like to win and my bottom line is important to me. Whats the fastest way for a beginner to get a jump on the learning curve on playing heads up and in short handed pots? Is there any literature on the matter? I just clicked on to this heads up part of the twp plus two site and shorthanded forum for the first time and plan on keeping up with the links when i have the time. If you have any suggestions or tips i would greatly appreciate it. By the way your post was very interesting. I'm sure your contributions will be appreciated. Sincerely, Bill. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
The only literature I'm aware of is the short handed section in HEFAP21, which is limited (i.e., not too long) but very good. There are a number of on-line sites where you can play heads-up for free, which is a good way to practise. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
There are a lot of things to think about here. Since this post is so long, I'll just comment on a couple of things. Main thing of playing heads up is the control of the betting. Now, controlling the betting does not necessarily mean you have to bet every time. The concept of this is that when you want the money in the pot, it gets into the pot, and when you don't, there is no bet. It's that simple. But to accomplish this, it takes great skills. To begin with when playing heads-up, you determine the type of opposition you are facing. Is he aggressive, super aggressive, passive, tight, or will he battle every hand with you until the finish. Not having the opposition able to read your style is the difference between winning and losing. I think this is right on. I think aggression per se is often over-rated, but the concept of controling the betting is good. Especially good is controling the betting without the opposition realzing what your are doing. Object of the game is to get the money called when you have the best of it and have free cards given to you with the worse of it. I don't quite agree with this. I think it's the right way to think against certain types of opposition (in particular, opponents who don't fold as often as they should), but against opponents who fold too much (or fold at the correct frequency) you want to think more in terms of getting them to fold their hands when you have the worse of it than of getting free cards. For example, say you raise on the flop with a draw that can only win if you catch your draw or your opponent folds. Do you continue betting on the flop, or do you take a free card? Against a calling station type opponent who doesn't fold as often as he should, you take the free card. Against most opponents, however, you're better off betting hoping that your opponent will fold or you make your hand. When you semi-bluff a drawing hand, you can either play for a free card or try to win the pot through aggression, but not both (you can't have your cake and eat it too). You have to decide which way to go. I think against most opponents you're better off trying to win the pot. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
Hi Bill. My advice to you is to stick with your full game until you get more experience before trying the short-handed and heads up games. Much of the skill necessary to play a good heads up or short-handed game comes from being able to read your opponent's cards. Another necessary skill is your ability to get into your opponent's head. If you were to jump into a heads up game right now, it would be like jumping into a school of perannahs after you cut your finger. If you think that you stood a fighting chance because you play tight, you would be broke in less than a heartbeat. You need to get some experience against loose, wild, maniac type players instead of the calling stations. You need to know how to handle those sort of players in a full game before tackling heads up or short-handed contests. You need to know when to come back over the top at them or just let them go or just run with them. It gets back to reading their hands. The most difficult players to read are the loose maniacs. Also, in heads up games, you will run into counterfeit calling stations. They are capable of switching gears on you at anytime and the call you all the way to the river without ever betting their hand. Sometimes they will have nothing. Sometimes they will have a monster. But you will never know it. They determine to stay with the hand either before the flop or after they see the flop. They could also be using game theory to make their decision to stick it out. Honestly, I think you missed the perspective of this forum. I may be wrong but I think you're looking for advice on how to play when it's you and another player or two in your full ring game. If that is the case, the most important thing you can do is read as many books as you can. Read the posts on this site. Read the Usenet posts at rec.gambling.poker. Read as much about the game as you can. The second thing you can do is ask questions. Put your posts here. Dig for the answers. The third thing is to play. Keep a log and a list of lessons learned. Evaluate your play with more scrutiny after a winning session than a losing session. Poker is an endless quest for knowledge of the game. If you are a true poker player, you never stop learning about the game. It is also an endless cycle of reading and thinking about the game away from the tables and playing. There is also a potential flaw in your game. Of course, you want to win. But so do all the other players at your table. If you hold your "bottom line" too close, you may create a major problem in your game. You will have some losing sessions as well as some winning ones. The difference between them should be your "bottom line". The "will" to win is nothing without the "will" to prepare. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
Hey KSU78, your exactly right about warning me not to become somone's dinner playing in heads-up matches. I think that would be very dumb, but appreciate the cautionary warning. What i meant was heads-up confrontations in full low limit ring games. If i'm in a full game and reraise with AK, AJs, Tens, etc., i can often get it heads-up and it's these situations that i think i could use alot of improvement. I was leary of buying HPFAP (Holde'm poker for advanced players, right?) because i'm not anywhere close to being an "advanced player." Krieger and Lee Jones wrote books on winning low limit holdem but don't offer anything on shorthanded games and HU confrontations. I think i'll go ahead and get HPFAP if it's got a section on it. I've only got 250 live hours of play time so i'm not being hard on myself nor do i want to get ahead of myself (i know there's no substitute for experience and what you said about play-read, play-read, play-read . . . . . is good advice). Thanks for responding. Your advice is appreciated. PS. As to my bottom line reference, i meant my hourly win rate (that's how you good players keep score right!). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
Don't be frightened by the "for Advanced players" part. This was a marketing decision to sell books because "all poker players think they're advanced". That book is a must have. If you're interested in heads-up play, the Theory of Poker is excellent too. A lot of the principles explained there are most applicable to heads-up play and are useful in many situations. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
HPFAP is for the novice as well as the advanced player. I suggest that you re-read Lee's book and look for the principles involved. Principles are a little elusive but they are there. They are usually in the form of things not to do, like semi-bluffing a calling station. Why do you raise with pocket aces? Why is AJ offsuit or KJ offsuit dangerous hands that can usually be dumped in a raised pot? A classic of mine is what do you do with AA on the button when there is a straddle and 5 or more callers? Really look at starting hand theory and why certain hands don't play well under certain conditions and why others do. Learn the different flop types and how the starting hands apply to them. For the most part, you are playing in a game that requires showing the best hand. For your game and what you are seeking, rely on the pot odds with respect to your draws. Try to learn the strength of your hand with respect to the board. Estimate what odds your opponent needs for each round. Learn how to put a read on your opponent. If you know what cards your opponent holds, the rest is easy. In my most perfect game, $15-30 at Bellagios a few years ago, I was doing it all, knowing the odds of my draw, the strength of my hand versus the field, and the cards my opponents held as well as the odds to their draws. I had a beautiful pyramid in front of me. There is no other way to play. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
Thanks guys. Tewall, i'll get hpfap. As to understanding and using principles, i've been working on that too. I still semi-bluff calling stations way too often but am learning to "when in Rome do like the Romans" and play their "style" more when a game is dominated by loose passive calling stations as opposed to how i would play them before which was to try to ram and jam it up with marginal raises. I still don't think i could bring myself not to raise with AA on the button with 6 players already in, but now i call with AKo in that situation and others like it while understanding why it's better to do so. Before i would raise with any hand that was raisable like KJo in middle position with four already in, now i dump it. When i do raise or re-raise with AKo it's to get it HU or clear out the field. These are things i didn't understand at first. You know, the book said i could raise with ATo in middle position so i did, irregardless of anything! Now the only time i'll raise with ATo is in late postion or the cut-off to steal the blinds or when i'm on the button to try to knock out the blind and isolate the one player who called the blind. Anyway i'm just rambling. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How good is this advice??
You probably know that already, but I found Abdul's "Short table strategy"-post very useful (see link below). cu Ignatius |
|
|