Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2004, 11:08 AM
Guy McSucker Guy McSucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,307
Default QQ, A on board, two opponents

Party 5/10 6-max.

QQ in CO. Limp, I raise, Button (loose/passive on the whole) calls, BB and limper call.

Flop: As 6s 5d. I have the Qs.

Checked to me, I bet, button calls, BB folds, limper calls. Limper gets attached to any pair and plays pretty much any two that take his fancy.

Was my flop bet optimistic? Should I shut down now?

Turn: 5s.

What's my plan?

Guy.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2004, 11:36 AM
Guido Guido is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 942
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

I would bet, you could very well have the best hand and if not you probably have a lot of outs. When they both call and you don't improve on the river I would probably check-call.

Guido
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2004, 12:04 PM
DrGutshot DrGutshot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 131
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

I would often be tempted to bet the river as well IF the flop was more like A/T/4 or A/J/8 because it is more likely they are calling me down with mid pair. However, I think in this case betting the turn and check/calling the river is right.
If you are raised on the turn, call and fold a non-spade river.

-DrG
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2004, 02:27 PM
Guy McSucker Guy McSucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

[ QUOTE ]

I would bet, you could very well have the best hand and if not you probably have a lot of outs. When they both call and you don't improve on the river I would probably check-call.


[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks chaps.

That's just what I did. Bet turn, button called; check-called river to be shown 66 for the flopped set and turned full house.

I've posted a few hands where I felt I'd perhaps gone too far with my hand, and been told by people who should know that I've done okay. So that's not the reason I'm struggling to beat these games... better look elsewhere for leaks.

Where might I look?

(One leak I identified with the help of pokertracker is that I'm being dealt AA 30% less than I should be over 15k hands... I can't do much about that, though, can I? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] )

Guy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2004, 03:00 PM
Guido Guido is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 942
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

Maybe you should call down more.
Maybe you should bet more for value.
Maybe you should raise more preflop.
Maybe you should defend more in the blinds.
Maybe you should steal more.
Maybe you should slowplay less.
Maybe you should check-raise more to protect your hand.
Maybe you have played less than 50K hands and you just didn't get your share of good cards.

I really don't know what your leaks are/could be. Just post some hands when you aren't sure.

Thanks,

Guido
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2004, 03:36 PM
MEbenhoe MEbenhoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 410
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

[ QUOTE ]
I would bet, you could very well have the best hand and if not you probably have a lot of outs. When they both call and you don't improve on the river I would probably check-call.

Guido

[/ QUOTE ]

One part of this statement I question, if he is behind how in the world does he have a lot of outs? Any hand he'd be behind at this point, he'd only have 2 outs to beat. That's not a lot imo.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2004, 04:11 PM
vector vector is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

The turn brought the third spade, he has the Qs, second nut flush draw. If he is behind he's likely behind to an ace, so the flush outs are often good. Not this time as it turned out.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-14-2004, 05:18 PM
Joe826 Joe826 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

[ QUOTE ]

Maybe you should defend more in the blinds.
Maybe you should steal more.


[/ QUOTE ]

i get what you are saying, but for a struggling player i don't think these 2 things are primarily what's giving them a hard time. in fact, i found that when i was struggling i was probably giving too much action in these situations.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2004, 05:19 PM
TazQ TazQ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 175
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

You can't check call the river against loose passive opponents.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2004, 07:35 PM
Guido Guido is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 942
Default Re: QQ, A on board, two opponents

I agree with you, just gave some things he might have a look at. It really depends on his stats. I mean when he defends 20% in the BB he has a big problem. When he defends 30% it's still a problem but a lot smaller.

Guido
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.