Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:21 PM
Marquis Marquis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 177
Default Tighties (low content)

Does anyone else find that the players who play the most hands on Party .5/1 all play the same way, and that is ultra-tight? When I sort my PT summary stats by hands played, I have to go pretty far down the list to find a player other than myself with an icon that isn't a mouse (using bison's ratings).

Does anyone have a theory as to why this might be?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:23 PM
meanjean meanjean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 224
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

I find just the opposite...5-7 players every hand...people betting and calling with bottom pair or less...sometimes averaging 10BB per hand.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:27 PM
meanjean meanjean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 224
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

oh my bad...I have never done that with poker tracker. I thought you meant the average table
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:25 PM
davelin davelin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

Those with the most hands in your Poker Tracker are most likely those people who play quite a bit and/or play quite seriously. It's not surprising that they tend to be tighties IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:33 PM
Marquis Marquis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 177
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

It's just suprising that the people who play the most really aren't that good. Perhaps if they were better they'd move up. Or perhaps they are content making 2 BB/hour playing a style that's pretty simple to multi-table with.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:44 PM
mack848 mack848 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 105
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

I think that I am quite 'good' in the 50/1 game: I make 2BB/hour (at most, per table), yet I don't think I'm ready to move up yet.

Many of the players I come across regularly are TAA or SLAAs doing much the same as me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:45 PM
davelin davelin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
It's just suprising that the people who play the most really aren't that good. Perhaps if they were better they'd move up. Or perhaps they are content making 2 BB/hour playing a style that's pretty simple to multi-table with.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure what you mean, isn't the style we all advocate here a tight-is-right style of play? The mouse icon is TP-A, meaning that you may not have enough of a sample size to accurately gauge their pre-flop statistic, meaning that some of these players may actually be Moneybags.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:49 PM
Marquis Marquis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 177
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

I have 2K+ hands on all these players. They are not moneybags.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:56 PM
Marquis Marquis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 177
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

I might say it's a sample size thing if it wasn't 25+ players all playing the same way. As a group, with plenty of hands to constitute a large enough sample, they are a single large mouse (a rat?), and separated from the group, each individual is still a mouse.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:59 PM
davelin davelin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Default Re: Tighties (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
I have 2K+ hands on all these players. They are not moneybags.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, well they don't play a wide range of hands pre-flop and they're aggressive with their made hands post-flop. Maybe they don't raise/re-raise with 99, TT, AJo, AJs, ATs, KQo. But they're probably better than 75% of the players out there.

Even with the SSH-style of play, I think one can only reasonably expect a winrate of 2-4BB/100 hands. So maybe they're towards the bottom of that range, but I'm not sure why you say they're not necessarily good players?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.