Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2004, 04:05 PM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 792
Default Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

Party $10 SNG. Blinds 150/300. I am UTG/CO with T2100; button has T800, SB T4100, and BB T1000. I have A9o and push. Get called by SB big stack with AQo. End of SNG.

Should I have folded here? I have a good chance at 2nd place money by playing passively.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2004, 04:18 PM
ThorGoT ThorGoT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

Yes, you should have played tighter. I have made the same mistake at a higher buy-in game, and it stinks. This hand, the small blind (big stack) will probably steal from the big blind, no matter what he has. The two small stacks are going to have to try to steal soon, and are likely to go bust (say, 50/50 chance for each, both do it, 75% chance that one of them will go out). Wait until three are left, open it up then. Jump from fourth to third is the biggest proportional jump of all.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2004, 04:30 PM
TheDrone TheDrone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 122
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

Depends on how tight the table is playing on the bubble, especially the big stack. If they will call with any ace, then I think A9o is good enough. Basically you don't want to push it if the only calls you get are pocket pairs or AT+. Overall I fold A9o in this spot much more than I play it though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2004, 04:34 PM
captZEEbo1 captZEEbo1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 264
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

there are a few ways to play this hand. Either fold (always good, since there's a decent chance the shortstacks will push at eachother if the bigstack doesn't steal for them), limp or MIN raise. I'm NEVER going allin here. When there's a guy with twice your stack acting after you, you have to play a LITTLE different. A min raise, would accomplish the same thing as an allin. If the bigstack calls, you'll be in check/fold mode unless you hit a really good flop (hard to do with A9o). If he pushes, he isn't screwing around and has a good hand (or is very aggressive and a gambler). If he folds and either shortstack calls, they are essentially calling allin, b/c he'll be so pot committed, he'll be forced to call allin (or will push allin) on any flop.

A limp is not bad either. Unless someone has a good hand, big stack will fold, sb will fold (assuming you will call and likely have him dominated) and bb will check. Then just min bet any flop and he'll probably fold. The key is to avoid confrontations with someone who WON'T be hurt if he calls your allin.

Right now, I'm probably folding utg. A9 is good 4 handed, but not GREAT. If you're called you're usually WAY behind (except if someone is desperate).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2004, 08:41 PM
lorinda lorinda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: England
Posts: 2,478
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

You have something like 1100 "spare" chips here, I mean you can lose that much and still be second place.

You can raise to an arbitary number here - I like 750 - without risking your whole tourney as long as it's between a mini raise and the 1100.

I think you have to raise to keep the pressure on the small guys.

Lori

Lori
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2004, 08:57 PM
morgan180 morgan180 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: wildly chasing WPT qualifiers
Posts: 212
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

I would fold in this instance. Let the chip leader in the SB put the pressure on the shorter stacks - especially your nearest competition the big blind. Then when you are in the BB its your turn to put the pressure on him again when he's in the SB.

But if not I like Lorinda's play - and will use that one myself (ty lorinda!)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2004, 09:02 PM
Jason Strasser Jason Strasser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 71
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

[ QUOTE ]
You have something like 1100 "spare" chips here, I mean you can lose that much and still be second place.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maaaaaaah. Bleh.

This line of thinking is very dangerous in my opinion. Very dangerous. First of all, because a sit and go pays out 2xbuyin to third, 3x to second, and 5x to first, you get rewarded for finishing first. (on party)

So, this type of thinking where "I can lose x chips and stay ahead of y" is really flawed. Your goal is to pick hands with enough equity to push in the right spots, and to execute. A9, 4 handed, UTG, has plenty of value IMO to push. In fact, it's not even close. I'd push KT, KJ, A7, 22 here given the right table conditions and current blind size and stack size.

The fact is, you can not play scared of being busted out. You will get rewarded for the times you steal blinds and play aggressive. Raising to 750 invites smart big stacks to play back at you. In fact, if I were the big stack and you raised to 750, I would set you all in with almost any 2 cards, because your raise screams I have a hand I want to raise with but dont want to go bust with on the river. The higher level of sng you play, the more you will understand that you must push this hand preflop, or fold, otherwise you will get eaten alive by smart players.

Be confident with your moves, finish fourth and first more often, and you will win more money than playing scared, as Lorinda suggested. The thought that you have spare chips here because you are x amount ahead of the others should not enter your thoughts.

My 2 cents,

-Jason
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2004, 09:08 PM
lorinda lorinda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: England
Posts: 2,478
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

Jason, whilst I agree, you are missing one vital piece of information.

Party $10 SNG

Although you will find some smart stacks at this level, most players are just playing their cards and paying almost 0 attention to what you raise, why you raise or what you might have.

I certainly wouldn't make this play in a 2+2sng or at the $50 level, but $10 games, at least in my opinion, are a simple case of get what you can as cheap as possible.

I post this, not to argue with you, as I respect your opinion highly, and others should go back, right now, and re-read your post.
I just feel you give the low limit players too much credit.

Armed with both posts, people should make their own decisions based on the standard of the specific sit and go they are in and what has gone before.

Certainly this is not often an option if there are skilled players on the table.

Lori
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-01-2004, 09:10 PM
ron dogg ron dogg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

This is great stuff and imo, totally correct. Playing not to lose is a sure way to hit the rail. I think this is an easy push here. In NLH short handed it is the aggressor who gets the spoils.

that is all-
R-
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-01-2004, 09:14 PM
Jason Strasser Jason Strasser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 71
Default Re: Should I have played tighter as 2nd stack 4 handed?

Ok, I concede. In the 30s on party, there were enough aware players, and that is what I had in mind while writing my post. But if the 10s are really that horrible, I'm sure there are all sorts of lovely holes in my game.

Cheers,

-Jason
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.