#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stud vs. Hol\'em
Dear Players, I'm interested in your "gut" feeling about the following question: which game,in general,is more difficult to beat as the limits in both games increase. For example,is 20-40 stud more difficult to beat than 20-40 hol'em? What about 75-150 stud vs 75-150 hol'em? Sitting Bull |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stud vs. Hol\'em
I'm going to answer a slightly different question. It is a little more difficult to become a stud expert than it is a hold 'em expert. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stud vs. Hol\'em
Dear Mason, Thanks for the I/P. Sitting Bull |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stud vs. Hol\'em
This is only from my personal experience, so take that into consideration. I find that at the middle limits, the holdem games are softer in general, but at limits like 75-150, stud is definitely the better game for a few reasons. First and maybe most importantly, holdem games rarely get spread at these limits from what I've seen, while stud games are quite prevalent. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stud vs. Hol\'em
Dear George, Thanks for your I/P . I need you to define "soft" with respect to stud and hol'em. I do not know what a "soft game" is? Sitting Bull |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stud vs. Hol\'em
Dear George, Thanks for the I/P. Please define "soft" with respect to stud and hol'em. Sitting Bull |
|
|