#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why does 1 + 1 = 2
I've seen a proof or two that I can't even remember on this topic; and I was wondering if any readers out there can show the proof of 1 + 1 = 2. I actually give Sklansky a 50% chance of knowing the right answer. The rest of you, well not much chance. But surprise me if you can. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why does 1 + 1 = 2
Honestly You are a freak buddy, your lost !!! regards, -MJ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why does 1 + 1 = 2
In college, I actually took a course in this stuff. It has something to do with the fact that 1 has a successor. I'll let others elaborate. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Once you can prove that \"1\" exists, the . . .
rest of the proof is fairly straight forward. The hardest numbers to prove are 0 and 1. Of course, I took that course in 1988, and I sure don't remember it off the top of my head. Good luck! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Try It In An Elevator *NM*
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why does 1 + 1 = 3...??
that's what happened with me and the little lady...a family man now...used to be a line in a who song...behind blue eyes...gl |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Correct
Yes, 1 + x is defined as the successor to x, and 2 is the successor to 1. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why does 1 + 1 = 2
I suppose you can just turn it around. 2 is defined as the addition of 1+1. How do you prove it? You can do something simple and take an object and say that this represents the number 1. A second object, together with the first, represents the number two. If your definition of the number 1 is different from ours, then so be it. But your number 1 will have no basis for what is in the real world. In the end, though, you don't need to prove anything. You merely need to accept that definition at 2 = 1 + 1. If you don't accept it, fine. Then YOU must prove that it is false. We do not need to prove that it is true. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why does 1 + 1 = 2
spikey, on many boards, this question usually yields the response, "do your own homework." the club |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What matters is 2+2 not 1+1 *NM*
|
|
|