Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2004, 04:41 PM
teddyFBI teddyFBI is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 99
Default Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

I see this time and again at the 3/6 tables: players call pre-flop, and it gets raised behind them, and then instead of calling to see the flop, they muck. It seems most prevalent when the preflop raiser is in one of the blinds: i guess they figure a blind out of position must REALLY have a monster hand in order to raise.

Is this EVER correct?
sure, sometimes I make a loose preflop call with something like QTo, and it gets raised behind me, and i figure I'm probably behind, and maybe even dominated, but i figure the extra $ in the pot more than compensates for starting a little behind.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2004, 04:44 PM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

Pretty much no, if you weren´t in the SB.
Sthief posted about this like a while ago, try searching for that, there will be more info.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2004, 04:47 PM
Zetack Zetack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop r

[ QUOTE ]
I see this time and again at the 3/6 tables: players call pre-flop, and it gets raised behind them, and then instead of calling to see the flop, they muck. It seems most prevalent when the preflop raiser is in one of the blinds: i guess they figure a blind out of position must REALLY have a monster hand in order to raise.

Is this EVER correct?
sure, sometimes I make a loose preflop call with something like QTo, and it gets raised behind me, and i figure I'm probably behind, and maybe even dominated, but i figure the extra $ in the pot more than compensates for starting a little behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't tell you if its correct or not, but I never do it--at least not for one more bet. I may fold if comes back to me three bet or capped.

I will however complete from the small blind (in a .5 small bet structure) and sometimes (ok rarely--but sometimes) fold to a raise from the big blind. I expect that wouldn't be right in a 1/3 small blind structure--if its good enough to complete there it should be good enought to stay in for a one bet raise.

--Zetack
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2004, 04:49 PM
sfer sfer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 806
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

Wasn't Josh's post about having to call 2 cold back to you after an openraise? I've seen him do that about 4 times and those folds were pretty routine each time. He would openraise in the CO or CO-1 and some combination of the button/blinds would 3-bet and then cap. I'd fold AQ/AJ in those spots unless they were total LAGs.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2004, 05:05 PM
sprmario sprmario is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 222
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

This is talked about in SSH I believe. If you call 1 bet you should call a 2nd, but if it's raised and reraised then you should tighten up again to the same standards as cold calling 2 to begin with. This is what I recall but I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2004, 05:58 PM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

that's correct.... always call for one more bet. always. when it's 2 more bets to stay... apply the same standards as if you hadn't yet committed any money to the pot (e.g.: as if calling 2 bets cold)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2004, 06:15 PM
Joe826 Joe826 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

The only time i've ever done this is when I accidentally limp with a junk hand or when the SB is 2/3s of the BB and I complete with some bad hands getting great odds but have to fold when the BB raises.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2004, 06:38 PM
BigBaitsim (milo) BigBaitsim (milo) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 373
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

In my home game this one fellas wife sometimes plays. If she raises preflop after I limp, I probably fold, because a raise can only mean she somehow already has a set, despite having been dealt only two cards. But aside from her, I call.

-Milo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2004, 04:12 AM
atrifix atrifix is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

Potentially it could be. For example, you limp up front with AQ, everyone folds to the button, who only raises with AA, KK, QQ, and AK. Folding to his raise would be prudent. However, these instances are so rare that you can more or less ignore them.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-18-2004, 04:18 AM
me454555 me454555 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 566
Default Re: Is it EVER correct to call pre-flop, but then fold to a pre-flop raise

For 1 raise, no. 2 raises, thats a different story. I've limped w/a small pp and button will raise and bb will 3bet. Usally its only 4 handed and I'm not calling 2 more to flop a set
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.