Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2004, 07:48 AM
GWB GWB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: A nice little white house with a garden of roses. Will return to my Crawford ranch in 5 years after my Second Term. Vote for me on November 2nd. Wish me luck.
Posts: 248
Default Pre-Election Bombing

They bombed Spain before their election.

Now they have bombed the Australian Embassy in Indonesia before both the Indonesian and Australian elections.

AUSTRALIA'S FORTITUDE

Does anyone doubt they will do it here, if they can?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2004, 12:37 PM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: Pre-Election Bombing

Your "they" is precisely why I will not vote for you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2004, 12:48 PM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: Pre-Election Bombing

Why do you refuse to honestly name the enemy?

"They" = Islamist terrorists. Islamism wants the world to be plunged into a new dark ages of Shari'a -based fundamentalism. We are engaged in a battle for civilization which our free, open, secular, mercantile culture must win to survive.

I, for one, have no problem with speaking the truth even if it offends somebody else's PC concept of cultural relativism.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2004, 12:57 PM
daryn daryn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,759
Default Re: Pre-Election Bombing

bad reason not to vote for a guy.

like my boy jay severin says, not all muslims are terrorists, but lately, all terrorists are muslims.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2004, 01:25 PM
jokerswild jokerswild is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 180
Default Re: Pre-Election Bombing

The invasion of Iraq dramatically improved this possibility. It failed to track Al Queda, while increasing the number of willing Islamic fundamentalists. Hosni Mubarak stated that the invasion of Iraq created 10,000 new Osamas. The only reason the Republicans continue to lie about Iraqi links to Al Queda prior to 9/11 is because they believe that if they lie often enough, then the public will believe it. Perhaps they are correct in this assumption. It does, however, violate the precept of the Presidential oath.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-2004, 01:28 PM
bigpooch bigpooch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 759
Default Re: Pre-Election Bombing

Can we make a few bucks on this? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-2004, 01:37 PM
cardcounter0 cardcounter0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,370
Default Who are the terrorists?

Cheney's recent statement of A Vote For Kerry Was A Vote For The Terroists was to me, a terroristic threat. Maybe we need to insure someone else takes the place of these thugs between the time Kerry wins in Nov. and is sworn in Jan. Who can trust what these immoral thugs will do?

I watched the PBS summary of the 9/11 commission hearings that they re-aired a few days ago.

Three things really stood out:

1) After the two planes had hit the Towers, and they realized a third plane was on the way to Washington, low level (national security-wise) FAA officials and NORAD was struggling with the decision on scrambling fighters to intercept. Where was Rumsfield? The decision to protect Washington had fallen by default on a FAA controller.

2) Later Cheney gave the orders to shoot down any more hijacked planes. Not the President, not Rumsfield, not the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I think it was at Karl Rove's suggestion, that about 20 minutes later, Cheney called the President and let him know what they had done and that the order had been given.

3) In a later conversation with Rumsfield, in talking about the shoot-down order, Cheney reports they have already shot down a couple of planes. Wouldn't these have been commercial airliners filled with innocent civilians? Cheney has no emotion, in fact, seems kind of proud of it.

In conclusion, The Administation was very ill-prepared to deal with a threat long before 9/11. It never held any high level meetings for months on threats (something the Clinton admin did on a daily basis). During 9/11, the President ran and hid on Airforce One, flying around the country, while low-level staff made decisions without guidance. THIRTY MINUTES after the Pentagon Crash, Rumsfield was heard remarking that they could possibly use this as an excuse to attack Saddam.

Charge these rascals with treason, and run them all out of the country. Let's put some people in there capable of setting aside their own interests for a moment, and actually protect the HomeLand!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-12-2004, 04:14 PM
Jimbo Jimbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Planet Earth but relocating
Posts: 2,193
Default Re: Who are the terrorists?

1) Not sure of your point here, difficult to make a decision prior to being informed of the exact situation.

2) Here is the correct quote:

[ QUOTE ]
"Pursuant to the president's instructions, I gave authorization for them to be taken out," Cheney told Rumsfeld, who was at the Pentagon. Informing Rumsfeld that the fighter pilots had received orders to fire, Cheney added, "It's my understanding they've already taken a couple of aircraft out."


[/ QUOTE ]

Your account was not quite accurate but I'll admit it does make for some good liberal propaganda.

"Cheney's recent statement of A Vote For Kerry Was A Vote For The Terroists "

Talk about a misquote! You could at least use the correct words and take them out of context like the majority of the media.

3) Again this is the applicable portion of the report:

[ QUOTE ]
Later, Cheney spoke to Rumsfeld via videoconference. When the vice president said the orders had been relayed to the jets and "a couple of aircraft" had been downed, Rumsfeld replied: "We can't confirm that. We're told that one aircraft is down but we do not have a pilot report that they did it."


[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting that you are able to find an emotion resembling pride in a written statement.

Perhaps you should have recorded the PBS summary so as not to make so many mistakes.

Jimbo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-12-2004, 05:04 PM
cardcounter0 cardcounter0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,370
Default Re: Who are the terrorists?

1) 45 minutes after the plane hits both towers, Bush is scrambling to fly to destinations unknown on Airforce One, Rummy hasn't seen fit to go to the War Room yet, and Cheney hasn't been evacuated from the White House to the Bunker. In the meantime, the FAA and NORAD is debating if they should scramble fighter jets to try to intercept the 3rd plane they have determined is heading for Washington. Basically it was up to the senior official of the FAA on duty at the time to make this National Security choice.

2) Cheney gave the shoot down order, then 20 minutes later called the President about it (after being prompted to do so by Rove). What don't you understand?

3) Thanks for the exact quote. "It's my understanding they've already taken a couple of aircraft out." Period. Those would have been a couple of innocent civilian filled aircraft, wouldn't they? So did Cheney have some inside information that they were all filled with liberals, or is he incapable of any emotion towards the loss of life?

I also question the fact that Cheney gave the order. My understanding that the President or Rummy would have been the appropriate source for such a drastic command.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-12-2004, 05:14 PM
Jimbo Jimbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Planet Earth but relocating
Posts: 2,193
Default Re: Who are the terrorists?

[ QUOTE ]
2) Cheney gave the shoot down order, then 20 minutes later called the President about it (after being prompted to do so by Rove). What don't you understand?


[/ QUOTE ]

You have a selective memory. Please read the report and you will see that you have made a mistake.

[ QUOTE ]
Bush and Cheney told the commission that they remember the phone call; the president said it reminded him of his time as a fighter pilot. National security adviser Condoleezza Rice, who had joined Cheney, told the commission that she heard the vice president discuss the rules of engagement for fighter jets over Washington with Bush.


[/ QUOTE ]

And

[ QUOTE ]
Only later did White House Deputy Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten suggest that Cheney call Bush once more to confirm the engagement order, according to the commission. Logs in Cheney's bunker and on Air Force One confirm conversations at 10:18 and 10:20, respectively.


[/ QUOTE ]

Jimbo
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.