Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2004, 01:18 AM
Navers Navers is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Default optimal tournament strategy

I play in a home game that's a $5 buy-in and there are usually 7-8 players. 1st gets $25, 2nd gets $7, 3rd gets $3. Is this a bit too top heavy for 1st place? I feel like when I'm heads up against my opponent it's okay for me to make calls where I'm 40% to win the hand but if I make it I'm virtually guaranteed to win.

For example, if I have K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and I somehow know I'm up against something like A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]10 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], I'm 40% to win. I know if I move all-in my opponent will call, but because 1st place gets so much it seems like I'd be making more money. Does this make any sense at all or would I be better off taking fewer coinflips to have a higher chance of winning by not taking these shots?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2004, 01:45 AM
RPatterson RPatterson is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 16
Default Re: optimal tournament strategy

That is too topheavy imo. You can't really argue a prize structure, they are what they are. But I don't see the point in paying out less than the buy-in. In my view if you somehow know your opponent has a better hand, and he'll call, you should fold unless your stack is so small in relation to the blinds your getting the right pot odds.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2004, 12:50 PM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Re: optimal tournament strategy

[ QUOTE ]
I play in a home game that's a $5 buy-in and there are usually 7-8 players. 1st gets $25, 2nd gets $7, 3rd gets $3. Is this a bit too top heavy for 1st place? I feel like when I'm heads up against my opponent it's okay for me to make calls where I'm 40% to win the hand but if I make it I'm virtually guaranteed to win.

For example, if I have K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and I somehow know I'm up against something like A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]10 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], I'm 40% to win. I know if I move all-in my opponent will call, but because 1st place gets so much it seems like I'd be making more money. Does this make any sense at all or would I be better off taking fewer coinflips to have a higher chance of winning by not taking these shots?

[/ QUOTE ]

You should almost never make -chipEV plays of any kind. The only exception is when the ONLY alternative is a bigger -chipEV play. That's rare.

Calling when there's play left on an expected 40/60 is idiotic. And 40/60 is nowhere near a "coin flip".

eastbay
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.