#1
|
|||
|
|||
Push or Fold
Party $20+2 SnG. Table is Loose/Passive to Weak/Tight. Generally, many see the flop and the first action on the flop takes the pot. You have T700, the blinds are 50/100 and increasing in 3 hands, so you are in "all-in or fold mode". You are dealt 77; you are UTG+1 and UTG folds. Do you push or fold- why?
Sorry- there are still 7 players at the table. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
If I had to choose between push or fold I would choose fold. Still early enough to look for a better hand.
Any thoughts on trying to limp/call small raise for a chance at a set? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
My thoughts: I lay this down. I think the key is the early position with 4 players left to act. If CO or on the Button, I think this is an easy push. MP2 probably a push as well assuming no limpers. From UTG or UTG+1 I still think it is too early to push with mid PP. In the actual hand I pushed and was called by AA; I think that is the risk of pushing with this from early position. I'm curious what some of the aggressive players (Strasser) would do here.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
Can't small raise as that would be T200 out of my 700 stack (plus I don't min raise- ever). I don't like limping because my only chance at winning the pot then is hitting the set (8:1 odds) since there will be other limpers and any overcard is trouble at this table. Even if I hit the set, this tables doesn't give much action (weak/tight). With blinds at 1/7th of my stack I'm push or fold.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
In 3 hands you'll be down to 2.5 BB (virtually no fold equity) and have to push before the blinds get to you again. I'd push here.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
i push and hope to get called by non higher paires who assume i am weak. 77 is not bad if called but it is on the low side of the hands i willpush with in this situation.
Pat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
This seems straightforward. You must push. Right now you have 700, it costs 150 to play a rotation, and it is about to go up.
There are eight hands (88-AA) that have you destroyed, and the rest have you at a coinflip. Plus, now is you push you have the chance of taking the blinds uncontested, which is ideal. If you wait any longer, your folding equity will be gone. IMO this is a push with 77, I'd probably push here with 22, QJo, A6o, 89s. That is just me. I would rather go down fighting for the blinds, then losing my folding equity and clinging on for dear life. Folding is not good, especially if your table has weak tight tendencies. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
I'd push.
Another option, which works better at a more aggressive table is a limp-push if someone reraises. Most players holding a decent hand in LP would raise to get the blinds out. You could limp, then re-raise all in, trapping any limpers and the blinds. If no-one raises, then you can try to outplay on the flop or (fingers-crossed) hit the set. Just another, albeit riskier, option. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
This was my original thought and was why I pushed in the hand. The more I thought about it, the more I became unsure. I know that I will get called here with an over pair (1010 and up for sure), and I'll probably get called with AK and maybe AQ/AJ (Party $20+2 even though table is generally weak/tight AQ/AJ generally play). From UTG+1 there is a good chance one of these hands is out there, so I feel I'm getting marginal folding equity from EP. I'm 50/50 or worse against any hand that will call, and from EP, I don't like my lack of information.
On the other hand, I definately agree that the loss of folding equity once the blinds pass hurts my aggressiveness from this point out. I'm a bit torn, but your post sways me to the push side, so I'll probably continue to push in this situation. I'm convinced. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Push or Fold
Is this a situation in which you might try a stop-and-go? I realize that this is technically played only from the blinds, but UTG is pretty close.
Call here, and if it's raised, re-raise all-in. Then go all-in on any flop. Just a thought. |
|
|