Implied odds! 77 with A at the tabel?

[Siingo]

Thanks!

Think that that is explaining it to me. That means that I usually have played right. I do throw away my low pair. The reason I did not do it this time was becaus they were almost maniacs ( LAGs bigtime, not many pots at that table that I won that was under $30 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ). Shall remember to only count the odds for the turn then with implied odds if I plan to throw away my hand there!!

Thanks a lot!!!!!

[afk]

The fact that they're laggish even decreases the correctness of the call based on implied odds too. If they're raising a lot, you're going to have to put in extra bets which puts a HUUUUUUUUGE cut in you implied odds.

[Siingo]

I think you are right!

[jmark]

It depends on who the lags are. The bet came from the BB and hero is on the button, so all he has to worry about is whether the SB will check-raise the flop. If he thinks the SB won't c/r then his implied odds are better with a laggy table (but not necessarily good enough to call the flop here).

PS (to the OP) table ends in le, not el. But label is spelled el not le. Don't ask me why English is so weird.

[afk]

You're correct, but he also needs to consider the turn as well. If there's the chance of a bet and raise before him on the turn then his implied odds are still shot because he'll have to call more bets than planned.

[chesspain]

[ QUOTE ]
You're correct, but he also needs to consider the turn as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

No he doesn't, since there is no way he's going to river if he misses on the turn.

[afk]

That's true. I guess I'm still hung up on this 11:1 to see the river thing they were discussing before. If you're absolutely not going to see the river (which you reaaaally shouldn't) then yeah, you only need to worry about the SB on the flop. Nevertheless, I'm with you and I think the flop is an easy fold.