![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a little off topic, but I occaisionally work at a site that uses a company LAN that blocks sites related to gambling (including 2+2) among other things. They also block proxy sites, or appear to. Anyway around this?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
This is a little off topic, but I occaisionally work at a site that uses a company LAN that blocks sites related to gambling (including 2+2) among other things. They also block proxy sites, or appear to. Anyway around this? [/ QUOTE ] Yes but doing so is a really good way to get fired. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they attack online poker (very unlikely) they do through the banks, not through the internet. They'll make it very difficult to get money from your bank account to a pokersite or neteller and vice-versa. Whether or not the sites could find an easy/convenient workaround would depend on exactly what restictions are put on the banks. Online poker would be screwed if every player had to mail a check or money order to the site to cash in, and recieve a check (or maybe even cash) through the mail or FedEx to cash out.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would take a concerted federal effort to find that on-line gambling is illegal and enforce it against individual users. I was merely trying to identify some factors that would seem to make this more unlikely than it would have been 5-6 years ago.
Also, it is not so simple as to whether a law in a particular state could be applied more directly to find that on-line gambling is illegal. Enforcement is made much more difficult by the inter-state/international nature of the internet and thus the federal/state lines become very blurry and complicated. |
![]() |
|
|