![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two databases
K9o 490 (.04) Q9o 548 (.07) J9o 527 (.03) T9o 504 (.07) K9o 592 (.10) Q9o 523 (.02) J9o 572 (.11) T9o 570 (.09) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
here you go, for what its worth. using latest database so not a huge sample size. by the way, are you weighting for sample size or not?
K9o 372 0.03 Q9o 378 (0.09) J9o 357 (0.08) T9o 377 (0.02) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice Post. You brought up a few points that I haven't thought of before. Now I have to check out a bunch of my weak hands in my PT database. I normally ignore the awful starting hands, but now I have a reason to study them as well.
Dave |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We're making great progress. Let's keep the momentum going and reach our goal of 100k samples for each hand.
Hand Samples Winrate K9o 29031 -0.01 Q9o 29447 -0.04 J9o 29466 -0.06 T9o 29127 -0.03 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
K9o 698 (.10)
Q9o 745 (.09) J9o 718 (.11) T9o 731 (.04) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
K9o 983 times +.01
Q9o 1056 times 0.00 J9o 992 times (.11) T9o 1012 times (.09) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Database 1:
K9o 347 hands .10 Q9o 393 hands .11 J9o 394 hands (.07) T9o 338 hands (.02) Database 2: K9o 885 hands 0 Q9o 885 hands (.05) J9o 852 hands (.02) T9o 809 hands (.09) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
K9o 1195 0.13
Q9o 1247 0.05 J9o 1249 (0.05) T9o 1201 (0.09) |
![]() |
|
|