|
|
#171
11-16-2005, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Brand Spankin\' New Glock 19
[ QUOTE ]
The simple fact is that you are just stating an opinion. You actually have no idea how things will go in each situation, and it's ridiculous to suggest that people should just hope for the best. People have a right to defend themselves. [/ QUOTE ] Not when it's at the cost of an innocent life I have the right to not have my life in the hands of some guy with a piece of paper that says he can carry a gun. Whats your point? "I have the right to defend myself" is not a valid argument. Hey why don't we take your argument even further. Criminal also have illegal guns, why don't we let people walk around with fully automatic machine guns. We have the right to defend ourselves right? Terrorist could have access to nucluer weapons, I guess we need those too to defend ourselves. As long as we sign a little piece of paper and wait a designated amount of time I guess we're qualified to handle them. 
|
|
#172
11-16-2005, 03:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brand Spankin\' New Glock 19
[ QUOTE ]
Whats your point? [/ QUOTE ] You're completely wrong. That was pretty much my only point, and I don't have anything else to say. It's clearly pointless to argue this with you, as you've already decided that those who disagree are insane.
|
|
#173
11-16-2005, 03:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brand Spankin\' New Glock 19
[ QUOTE ]
You're completely wrong. That was pretty much my only point, and I don't have anything else to say. It's clearly pointless to argue this with you, as you've already decided that those who disagree are insane. [/ QUOTE ] Well it's a pretty awful point. I disagreed with yasher but I don't think he was insane. I just think he was too confident that all gun owner are as responsible as him. You on the other hand think people should be able to carry guns because "we have the right to defend ourselves". This is laughable.
|
|
#175
11-16-2005, 04:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Question to moderators
Since pictures of guns are not considered offensive, could I start posting pictures of genitalia ?
Or are they considered more offensive than guns ? Any information would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. 
|
|
#176
11-16-2005, 04:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question to moderators
[ QUOTE ]
Since pictures of guns are not considered offensive, could I start posting pictures of genitalia ? [/ QUOTE ] No. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] Or are they considered more offensive than guns ? [/ QUOTE ] Allowing nudity on the site would end up being a problem for 2+2. Also, people get very touchy about NSFW stuff. You may post links to pics which include nudity, but please make sure to add the "NSFW" tag.
|
|
#177
11-16-2005, 04:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guns and Roses
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ...Could I start posting pictures of genitalia ? [/ QUOTE ] No. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Well, I just did. [ QUOTE ] Allowing nudity on the site would end up being a problem for 2+2. Also, people get very touchy about NSFW stuff. [/ QUOTE ] OK but why are pix of guns considered SFW but pix of genitalia NSFW ? Just curious...
|
|
#178
11-16-2005, 04:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Guns and Roses
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I just did. [/ QUOTE ] :groan: I'm pretty sure you know what I meant. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] OK but why are pix of guns considered SFW but pix of genitalia NSFW ? Just curious... [/ QUOTE ] Ask the major employers. They are the ones who get angry with people who have nudity on their screens and machines.
|
|
#179
11-16-2005, 11:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question to moderators
Time to wish the moderator a Happy Birthday!
|
|
#180
11-16-2005, 11:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Guns and Roses
I wonder why you'd think a photograph of a gun was NSFW.
Who do you work for that makes you so afraid to view a photograph of a handgun? Moreover, I find it amazing that you chose that - and not the other, more colorful, entertaining photograph to complain about [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] More pics of hot chicks kissing plz.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
