![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
So far, I've yet to see any error in my ways here....I'm not convinced that UTG bluffs over 10% of the time here.... J [/ QUOTE ] Keep in mind that UTG could have Ax here (Ax hearts maybe?), and one of your other two opponents could have a horribly misplayed pocket pair that didn't turn into a set. The button certainly has an ace to overcall the hijack, but the hijack could have less than a pair of aces, given that the turn was checked around. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The button certainly has an ace to overcall the hijack, but the hijack could have less than a pair of aces, given that the turn was checked around. [/ QUOTE ] Just in regards to what hijack could have.... There has to be a huge parlay for hijack to not have an ace here which means UTG doesn't have an ace: 1. No way he has JJ/QQ/KK - I have never seen one player at 30/60 play the hand this way. 2. a ten - without out another pair - like J10 - so you have to hope he called 2 cold on the flop with a J high pair draw with preflop 3 bettor yet to act 3. a nine - like J9 same comment in addition to the fact he didn't bet the turn once everyone else showed weakness 4. 77/88 you have to hope he thought UTG had a missed flushed draw and that nobody else would call. Out of all of these I think a hand with a nine in it is the most likely candidate for hijack to have that doesn't contain an ace but still probably less than 2% of the time. So in other words I thought it was a really bad fold at first but hand analysis shows it's a least a close call (in my opinion). But I still call in case UTG is an idiot and because I don't do this detailed of an analysis at the table. |
![]() |
|
|