Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
Old 10-09-2005, 03:15 AM
Precision1C Precision1C is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
Default Re: Party had no choice

Does Party Poker really want multitabling sharks gobbling their "fish" that much? Isn't the next step cutting down the amount of rakeback/affiliate rate to reduce the number of sharks? Since Party just cut out all the skins aren't you affiliates next on the chopping block? After all, you bring in sharks not fish and it looks like Party is trying to cut down the benefits given to sharks since they go where the fish are anyway. Being cynical I have to believe Party will try to recruit all the fish it can with advertising and raise the rake and pay the high limit volume players with somesort of direct rakeback with the extra income from the rake cap hike.

Review of events:
1. Party Poker attempts to suppress rakeback at their site.(We don't need large volume sharks, hurts affiliates since they lose clients)
2. Party basically removes itself from the Party network. (We don't need the large volume sharks that moved to the skins to get rakeback)

It looks to me like the next step is
3. Forces the large volume sharks to pay above market rake for access to their "fish". (The high volume shark needs Party a lot more than Party needs you.)
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.