Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-25-2005, 10:14 PM
DoctorWard DoctorWard is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 20
Default Pot odds v Implied odds

You are heads up at the end of a $10+$1 single table tourney. You have $7,000 in chips and your opponent has $8,000. The blinds are $300-$600 and you are the big blind with your opponent on the button. He's first to act and raises it to twice the big blind, or $1,200. You look down at your cards and you have 6s-9s you flat call the raise to see what the flop brings. The flop comes 8c-Ks-7s you're first to act and you bet the minimum, $600. Your opponent raises to the pot-size pre-flop, $2,400. At best you put your opponent on top pair but given previous play he's probably got a pocket pair and hit a set on the flop. What do you do ~ Call, Fold, or Raise (if Raise by how much)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2005, 04:37 PM
intheflatfield intheflatfield is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 195
Default Re: Pot odds v Implied odds

IMHO, depending of course on what kind of player he is. If I bet the min and get raised, I either fold or push. The likeliehood of him hitting trips heads up in this situation is less lilely than either TP or 2 pair.

Plus, if he did hit trips w/ p k's my guess is that he would have slow played a bit more. I put him on something like tp, good kicker.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-26-2005, 05:28 PM
bobman0330 bobman0330 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: Pot odds v Implied odds

Not a probability post.

You're a slight favorite over AK and a 41% dog against a set. push.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2005, 10:00 PM
DoctorWard DoctorWard is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: Pot odds v Implied odds

I originally wrote "your opponent on top pair but given previous play he's probably got a pocket pair and hit a set on the flop", lets assume he has hit a set. For probability purposes it does not matter which set he has hit as they all have 591 combinations of winning from 45C2 possibilities, or 59.70% of winning.

In this game the pot was $1,200 + $1,200 (pre-flop) then $600 + $2,400 (to this pot), or $5,400. The pot odds on you smooth calling are therefore $5,400/$1,800, or 3-to-1. However, as I understand it, the implied odds are $5,400 (existing pot) + $1,800 (to call) + 2 x $3,400 (to raise all-in and get matched) = $14,000 (or double your stack) to $5,200 (call + raise all-in) = 35-to-13 or 2.7-to-1.

Since you are getting better odds on your money by calling, plus it gives you the option of re-assessing the situation after the turn, I would only call.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2005, 10:09 PM
DoctorWard DoctorWard is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: Pot odds v Implied odds

Assuming that my analysis above it correct, I see it is directly relevant what the level of blinds are for whether you call or not. If the blinds are $300-$600 (as per the above example) then a call receives 3.00-to-1 odds, while an all-in raise receives only 2.69-to-1 odds.

If the blinds were $400-$800, then a call would receive 3.00-to-1 odds. This is because pre-flop your opponent raises to twice the big blind, or $1,600. On the flop you bet the minimum of $800 and he raises $3,200 which is the pot-size pre-flop. Therefore, the pot was $1,600 + $1,600 (pre-flop) then $800 + $3,200 (to this pot), or $7,200. The pot odds on you smooth calling are therefore $7,200/$2,400, or 3.00-to-1.

For an all-in re-raise the implied odds are $7,200 (existing pot) + $2,400 (to call) + 2 x $2,200 (to raise all-in and get matched) = $14,000 (or double your stack) to $4,600 (call + raise all-in) = 70-to-23 or 3.04-to-1.

Since now you are getting better odds on your money by re-raising all in, I would not call when the blinds are $400-$800 but move all-in.

This is a probability question, can any one shed some light on this?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2005, 10:10 PM
ratso ratso is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 3
Default Re: Pot odds v Implied odds

Depends on what the win means and how many slots it takes to be in the money. At a 10/1 single table, I would take a chance. It does not matter if he/she has top pair or a set at this point. I (you) need the straight (probably 8 outs). I go all in and take thke the shot. If it is a bigger stakes and bigger juice I would do something different depending on my eval of the player I am against.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-2005, 10:25 PM
DoctorWard DoctorWard is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: Pot odds v Implied odds

This is a $10+$1 single table tournament and not a cash game!

Mathematically what is the optimal solution assuming your opponent has the nuts (i.e. Kd-Kh) after the flop?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.