Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2005, 02:46 AM
Turk Turk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 81
Default Bubblenomics in action.

Party $22


Had villian marked as very tight, he got a big stack early on and and played very few hands since, he had folded his SB to me the last 4-5 hands. Here he pushed on me and I had a real hand, but not one I was willing to call with here.

Long story short, he had K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]...nothing, but I am begining to see how powerfull well timed aggression is on the bubble, how putting the opponent with the most to lose...not the one with the least to lose to the decision is so imperative.
This is common knowledge around here of course but I guess it took me a while to really understand this concept.

What would you need to have for a call here...QQ+?



Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (5 handed) converter

UTG (t865)
MP (t1950)
Button (t350)
SB (t2315)
Hero (t2520)

Preflop: Hero is BB with T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls t400, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls t350 (All-In), <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to t2000</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG calls t465 (All-In).

Flop: (t3615) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 2 all-in)</font>

Turn: (t3615) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 2 all-in)</font>

River: (t3615) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 2 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: t3615
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2005, 03:06 AM
Matt Walker Matt Walker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: Bubblenomics in action.

Nah I need way less than QQ+. Look at the stacks. If you win this, you can easily steal the next two hands the vast majority of the time so thats worth at least 600 chips. Anything that is ahead of his range I'm calling with and that breaks down to 88+ A8+ maybe KQ if I felt lucky. The A8 because allmost everyone is pushing any ace there and A8 is in the middle.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2005, 03:19 AM
Benholio Benholio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 238
Default Re: Bubblenomics in action.

I don't agree with calling mediocre aces and medium pairs here. You don't need to get mixed up in this with the next largest stack, and another player already in the pot.

If you fold, then either:
-SB wins: you are 4-handed, 4th place has &lt; 1xBB
-UTG wins: 5-handed, chipleader, good stealing position

Both of these are pretty good spots to be in.

I stick to a pretty tight calling range here.. maybe jacks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2005, 03:24 AM
GrekeHaus GrekeHaus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Zoidberg, for THREE!
Posts: 314
Default Re: Bubblenomics in action.

[ QUOTE ]
Nah I need way less than QQ+. Look at the stacks. If you win this, you can easily steal the next two hands the vast majority of the time so thats worth at least 600 chips. Anything that is ahead of his range I'm calling with and that breaks down to 88+ A8+ maybe KQ if I felt lucky. The A8 because allmost everyone is pushing any ace there and A8 is in the middle.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would consider calling this if UTG were already all in, but as it is, if you call, UTG will probably fold seeing that there's a good chance for him to get ITM. SB is the only person who can bust you and has already pushed all-in into a pot where there is going to be a show down. At the very least he has two over cards and you'll have to dodge a whole bunch of overs from him and the button to win this pot. Why mix it up here and risk your good stack?

If you fold, UTG will almost certainly call and if the big stack wins now YOU will be ITM with a very decent stack.

I think I would fold everything but AA and KK here.

Edit...I misread stack sizes, so I guess he can't bust you. I would go with JJ+ here. If he had you slightly covered, I would stand by my original analysis.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2005, 03:25 AM
Myst Myst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: Bubblenomics in action.

Id probably be JJ+ here due to the stack sizes, QQ+ at the $109s or higher.

UTG+1 is a moron. Well timed? Ha!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2005, 04:21 AM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Bubblenomics in action.

If I fold here its as much because I'm worried about UTG limping for half his stack as the fact that I think I may be behind the SB.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.