Low Nut Jam (tasty)

Joe Tall · #1 03-09-2005, 09:25 AM

Party Poker 10/20 Omaha/8 (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Joe Tall is BB with 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, 1 fold, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, 1 fold, Button calls, SB completes, Joe Tall checks.

Flop: (7 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (7 players)
SB bets, Joe Tall calls, UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, MP2 folds, MP3 calls, Button calls.

Turn: (6 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (5 players)
SB bets, Joe Tall calls, UTG+1 raises, MP3 calls, Button folds, SB calls, Joe Tall 3-bets, UTG+1 calls $19.78 (All-In), MP3 calls, SB calls.

River: (17.89 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (4 players, 1 all-in)
SB checks, Joe Tall checks, MP3 bets, SB calls, Joe Tall calls.

Final Pot: 20.89 BB

Take care and play well,
Joe Tall

e_fermat · #2 03-09-2005, 11:37 AM

I would re-raise on the river. The only raiser on the turn was UTG+1 and he is already all-in at this point. Jam those extra bets in with the nut low, highly doubtful you are getting quartered, MP3 is likely betting a straight.

mostsmooth · #3 03-09-2005, 02:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
MP3 is likely betting a straight.

[/ QUOTE ]
a straight? how the hell could he get there with straight cards?if i was gonna put him on a high hand, i would say flush, but im crazy, so who knows

e_fermat · #4 03-09-2005, 02:30 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
MP3 is likely betting a straight.

[/ QUOTE ]
a straight? how the hell could he get there with straight cards?if i was gonna put him on a high hand, i would say flush, but im crazy, so who knows

[/ QUOTE ]

My bad. I was thinking straight or flush but obviously the flush is more likely. A267 or something like that is possible though.

Nick709 · #5 03-09-2005, 05:50 PM

Looks like small blind has 24 also, at least without a read thats what I would think. Looks fine to me, however I would not raise on the river like some of these guys want to.

gergery · #6 03-09-2005, 07:16 PM

I’d have bet the river.

When UTG bets the turn when the low hits its more likely he has the low, so SB and MP3 or more likely to be on high hands.

You’d need to be quartered by either SB or MP3 (as opposed to UTG+1) at least 2 times out of 3 before the bet is unprofitable. And since UTG+1 came to life when the low hit, but MP3 came to life when the straight/flush hit its much less likely that you are splitting low with them.

Good to see you in this forum, Joe Tall. But bad to see you at the 10-20 tables….

--Greg

Nick709 · #7 03-09-2005, 07:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
But bad to see you at the 10-20 tables….

[/ QUOTE ]

And it's not even close.

Joe Tall · #8 03-09-2005, 08:02 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I would re-raise on the river. The only raiser on the turn was UTG+1 and he is already all-in at this point. Jam those extra bets in with the nut low, highly doubtful you are getting quartered, MP3 is likely betting a straight.

[/ QUOTE ]

I figured I'd avoid any extra mess with the player that is already all-in. Hopefully collecting an over call from the anyone who bets.

Thanks for your reply,
Joe Tall

Joe Tall · #9 03-09-2005, 08:03 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Looks like small blind has 24 also, at least without a read thats what I would think. Looks fine to me, however I would not raise on the river like some of these guys want to.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't have a read yet as this was his second hand, but I thought the same about his low holding.

Thanks for your reply,
Joe Tall

Joe Tall · #10 03-09-2005, 08:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I’d have bet the river.

When UTG bets the turn when the low hits its more likely he has the low, so SB and MP3 or more likely to be on high hands.

You’d need to be quartered by either SB or MP3 (as opposed to UTG+1) at least 2 times out of 3 before the bet is unprofitable. And since UTG+1 came to life when the low hit, but MP3 came to life when the straight/flush hit its much less likely that you are splitting low with them.

Good to see you in this forum, Joe Tall. But bad to see you at the 10-20 tables….

--Greg

[/ QUOTE ]

On the river, I didn't want to open my nose to a posible raise and re-rasie. I decided checking, hoping the SB would just call so I could overcall. If I'm going to bet out, why not go for the river check-raise. Rarely such a river will be checked through, right?

Thanks for the welcome,
Joe Tall