what's my river plan?

[crockpot]

you guys never sleep, do you? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] response time sure is better here than on the PLO board.

based on what i had seen from UTG, i think his minimum hand here is a set, but it is more likely he has A5 or 65 since he capped me. CO's hand is somewhat of a mystery, but a flush draw certainly makes sense.

my actual plan was: check, raise if UTG bets and CO calls, raise if UTG bets and CO folds, fold if UTG bets and CO raises, call if UTG checks and CO bets.

looking back, i'm not sure this is more profitable than betting. however, i think there was a good chance the passive UTG flat calls me here with a set, afraid of the flush. and if CO raises, i am certainly not happy i bet whether i call the raise or not. of course, there's a chance UTG will check a set upon seeing the heart, and i lose a bet by not betting.

i doubt that any course of action will change whether we lose CO. after that turn play, he has either made his draw or has a hand that he wants to show down.

thoughts?

[stigmata]

[ QUOTE ]
you guys never sleep, do you? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] response time sure is better here than on the PLO board.

[/ QUOTE ]

11AM here [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
my actual plan was: check, raise if UTG bets and CO calls, raise if UTG bets and CO folds, fold if UTG bets and CO raises, call if UTG checks and CO bets.


[/ QUOTE ]

That was my thoughts, but your right, half the time I try this it gets checked through. Maybe betting is better, but I really don't know!

[stripsqueez]

9pm here

you only really fear the cutoff having a flush - you are going to get callers when you bet so that fear simply doesnt justify the disaster that is it being checked all round

stripsqueez - chickenhawk