|
|
#21
03-02-2005, 08:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My Early Bust-Out Theory -- Tell me if I am wrong?
If you are playing as many tables as you can handle and are playing more for the immediate money than for either fun or education you should probably take $/hr into some consideration.
But, if you aren't maxed out on tables, then whenever you feel like making a move that is +CEV, but -$EV (or even -CEV???) just open up an additional table. Or maybe just play ring games where CEV=$EV. Or better yet, go crazy in the first round. It's all good. 
|
|
#22
03-02-2005, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: My Early Bust-Out Theory -- Tell me if I am wrong?
Ohman. I'm not going to read the thread since I assume someone else can explain it. Someone tell me if this hasn't happened.
|
|
#23
03-02-2005, 09:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: My Early Bust-Out Theory -- Tell me if I am wrong?
Do you intend to be a long term master of small fish? Do you think this strategy you're mastering will transcend to other poker genres (like stud, Omaha, etc)? Do you hope to increase your $/hr by playing fewer games for higher stakes at any future point in your life?
The answer to these questions should help you decide how you feel about your line of thinking. Frankly, I think you're a contrarian thinker, which is fine. So am I. But you might be way out in left field here.
|
|
#24
03-02-2005, 09:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: My Early Bust-Out Theory -- Tell me if I am wrong?
Hey guys, I ran some numbers on this and decided to put them in a new thread- http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...14&fpart=1
I think we may find it to not be profitable, but it's definitely worth a look. -Jman28
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
