Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   ak turn decision (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=165820)

edtost 12-22-2004 09:54 PM

ak turn decision
 
Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls.

Flop: (7.50 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 folds.

Turn: (4.75 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
UTG+1 checks, ......


check behind with my new outs, or bet again here?
opponent is too loose, but not incredibly donkish.

eric5148 12-22-2004 09:57 PM

Re: ak turn decision
 
Just keep going at it, you've got more outs now. This is pretty standard.

Evan 12-22-2004 10:12 PM

Re: ak turn decision
 
Your equity against a non reverse dominating pair w/o a diamond is just over 34%. So you need 16% folding equity here to make it +EV to bet. If he's real loose my guess is you don't have it.

I say check.

Lmn55d 12-22-2004 10:20 PM

Re: ak turn decision
 
I would definitely bet this. First, I think you have greater than 16% folding equity because people often call flop with anything and fold to turn bet. Second, I think you have the best hand a significant amount of time when you are called, so this is partially a value bet and you can check through on the river. The percentage of time you have the best hand and get paid off increases your equity significantly.

eric5148 12-22-2004 10:28 PM

Re: ak turn decision
 
[ QUOTE ]
Your equity against a non reverse dominating pair w/o a diamond is just over 34%. So you need 16% folding equity here to make it +EV to bet. If he's real loose my guess is you don't have it.

I say check.

[/ QUOTE ]

This isn't a complicated decision at all. You have a nut flush draw, two overcards, and your AK high might be good. Bet it.

Entity 12-22-2004 10:34 PM

Re: ak turn decision
 
[ QUOTE ]
Your equity against a non reverse dominating pair w/o a diamond is just over 34%. So you need 16% folding equity here to make it +EV to bet. If he's real loose my guess is you don't have it.

I say check.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but why does opponent have to have a pair here?

Seems like an easy bet HU.

Rob

Evan 12-22-2004 10:37 PM

Re: ak turn decision
 
Okay, looks like I failed in arguing the other side. I'd bet too but I thought I'd try to make a case for checking. I failed.

billuhbong 12-23-2004 12:13 AM

Re: ak turn decision
 
i definately disagree with checking, bet this turn

Grease 12-23-2004 12:16 AM

Re: ak turn decision
 
It's HU, you're betting. If you get called, you get called, but you don't have to be successful every time.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.