09-19-2005, 06:31 PM
Somehow I was able to find a copy of this elusive title at a local Borders. I noticed a fairly obvious mistake in the essay "A note on Starting Omaha hands" (Pg. 84-85). It's so obvious that I felt I must be missing something, and showed it to several friends who were able to confirm it.
He writes:
Suppose you have
A/images/graemlins/spade.gifQ/images/graemlins/heart.gif9/images/graemlins/club.gif8/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
and now you play it. Now on fourth street the board is
J /images/graemlins/diamond.gif 7 /images/graemlins/club.gif6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif5 /images/graemlins/heart.gif
....Now notice that if the board pairs you can lose to a full house or four-of-a-kind, if a spade comes you can lose to a flush, and if a nine or a ten falls, you can also lose to a higher straight.
As you can see though, while a nine would cause you to possibly lose to a Jack-high straight, a ten would in fact give you a Jack-high straight, and it would be the nuts.
Of course, I agree with the premise that you are in a vulnerable situation with this hand, but I'm quite suprised that this made to print.
He writes:
Suppose you have
A/images/graemlins/spade.gifQ/images/graemlins/heart.gif9/images/graemlins/club.gif8/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
and now you play it. Now on fourth street the board is
J /images/graemlins/diamond.gif 7 /images/graemlins/club.gif6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif5 /images/graemlins/heart.gif
....Now notice that if the board pairs you can lose to a full house or four-of-a-kind, if a spade comes you can lose to a flush, and if a nine or a ten falls, you can also lose to a higher straight.
As you can see though, while a nine would cause you to possibly lose to a Jack-high straight, a ten would in fact give you a Jack-high straight, and it would be the nuts.
Of course, I agree with the premise that you are in a vulnerable situation with this hand, but I'm quite suprised that this made to print.