valenzuela
08-15-2005, 04:05 PM
This hand (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=singletable&Number=2988622 &Forum=f22&Words=&Searchpage=0&Limit=100&Main=2988 622&Search=true&where=bodysub&Name=23682&daterange =1&newerval=1&newertype=&olderval=&oldertype=&body prev=#Post2988622) never left my head, and then I thought of an idea....implied ICM! thats it implied ICM!!!!
Implied ICM consist of the following:
Youre in the blinds and you are very likely to go all-in next hand so.......
You take ure stack and u put it against the BB on a ficticious showdown( in which U win 50% of the time). Is that ficticious showdown reliable? Well its better than the original ICM anyway. Ive always seen in many discutions somebody argueing that ICM doesnt know about your small FE, well do a ficticious showdown against the BB( or the SB if youre the BB).
By now ,probably, only 10% of 2+2ers have an idea about what Im talking about..but if you read on, you might figure out what Im trying to talking about.
OPEN THE LINK AND KEEP IT OPEN!!!!!!!
So if I fold I have $18 according to ICM, well Implied ICM doesnt think so.
Implied ICM thinks I have $16,7. ( Imagine next hand u go all-in against the BB, if u win u will have $33,4) What if BB folds?? What if this? what if that? The only point of Implied ICM is to take into account a highly possible showdown for all your chips against somebody , a highly possible showdown that regular ICM doesnt take into account.
So now in my 65 hand you only need to win 38% of the time, still incorrect to call maybe.
Implied ICM should only be used in the blinds...for now.
Anyway maybe Implied ICM has been tried or proposed before, anyway thats all for now.
Implied ICM consist of the following:
Youre in the blinds and you are very likely to go all-in next hand so.......
You take ure stack and u put it against the BB on a ficticious showdown( in which U win 50% of the time). Is that ficticious showdown reliable? Well its better than the original ICM anyway. Ive always seen in many discutions somebody argueing that ICM doesnt know about your small FE, well do a ficticious showdown against the BB( or the SB if youre the BB).
By now ,probably, only 10% of 2+2ers have an idea about what Im talking about..but if you read on, you might figure out what Im trying to talking about.
OPEN THE LINK AND KEEP IT OPEN!!!!!!!
So if I fold I have $18 according to ICM, well Implied ICM doesnt think so.
Implied ICM thinks I have $16,7. ( Imagine next hand u go all-in against the BB, if u win u will have $33,4) What if BB folds?? What if this? what if that? The only point of Implied ICM is to take into account a highly possible showdown for all your chips against somebody , a highly possible showdown that regular ICM doesnt take into account.
So now in my 65 hand you only need to win 38% of the time, still incorrect to call maybe.
Implied ICM should only be used in the blinds...for now.
Anyway maybe Implied ICM has been tried or proposed before, anyway thats all for now.