View Full Version : Monsters under the bed or a good slow down?
Phoenix1010
08-11-2005, 02:47 PM
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 max, 5 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)
MP ($65.05)
Button ($1.45)
Hero ($48.28)
BB ($67.35)
UTG ($88.81)
Preflop: Hero is SB with 9/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, A/images/graemlins/spade.gif. Hero posts a blind of $0.25.
UTG calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero (poster) completes, BB checks.
Flop: ($1.50) 9/images/graemlins/heart.gif, 4/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 5/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $1.5</font>, BB folds, UTG calls $1.50.
Turn: ($4.50) A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $3</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $6</font>, Hero calls $3.
River: ($16.50) 7/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $9</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $18</font>, Hero calls $9.
Final Pot: $52.50
gol4pro
08-11-2005, 02:58 PM
I'd say it's 50/50 between him having 2 pair or worse, and having you beat. Looks fine.
djoyce003
08-11-2005, 03:21 PM
good slow down...in fact I might have check/called the river. He could have a set or straight, but a worse 2 pair is probably more likely. I don't want to play for my stack here though, so I like slowing down here.
check call river. no reason to bet there unless you are planning on calling a big raise or push.
kevkev60614
08-11-2005, 03:44 PM
Do you know anything about UTG? I think a terrible player wouldn't have smooth called a set on the flop and raised the turn, but probably would have called the flop with Ax, A4, or A5. If he was terrible, I probably wouldn't have slowed down. If he was decent, this was a good play.
I like to play small pots w/ 2pair. I would have probably folded to a big turn or river raise. How weak is that?
davekngs
08-11-2005, 04:07 PM
played perfectly if you ask me. I disagree with check calling the river, I think you done the right thing by betting and calling raise. 5 handed on a very safe board this is a big hand and i think you got good value out of it without overplaying it, nice IMO
Andrew Fletcher
08-11-2005, 04:28 PM
I would've raised the turn. That min-raise screams to me that he just called your flop bet w/ an ace. It could also be a pure bluff-- you bet w/ a pair of nines and now he's trying to use the ace as a scare card. I suspect he has A2-AT. If he is very passive, he might have AJ-AK. Most people raise with a pocket pair pre-flop 5 handed, so I think a set is very unlikely.
I think you are way ahead in this hand and should try to get as much money as possible out of villian. 60% he has a pair of aces, 20% he is on a pure bluff, 15% he's got a worse two pair. 5% he has a set.
Godfather80
08-11-2005, 04:47 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 max, 5 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)
MP ($65.05)
Button ($1.45)
Hero ($48.28)
BB ($67.35)
UTG ($88.81)
Preflop: Hero is SB with 9/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, A/images/graemlins/spade.gif. Hero posts a blind of $0.25.
UTG calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero (poster) completes, BB checks.
Flop: ($1.50) 9/images/graemlins/heart.gif, 4/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 5/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $1.5</font>, BB folds, UTG calls $1.50.
Turn: ($4.50) A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $3</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $6</font>, Hero calls $3.
River: ($16.50) 7/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $9</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $18</font>, Hero calls $9.
Final Pot: $52.50
[/ QUOTE ]
Good slow down. I also say check-call the river. That turn raise is somewhat spooky considering his flop call. I think that you are probably ahead on the river more than you are behind. Did he show you the same hand?
Phoenix1010
08-11-2005, 05:37 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Did he show you the same hand?
[/ QUOTE ]
Villain showed A4.
-Phoenix
Macquarie
08-11-2005, 07:26 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I would've raised the turn...I think you are way ahead in this hand and should try to get as much money as possible out of villian.
[/ QUOTE ]
If you think villain has a pair or is on a bluff, raising the turn is absolutely the worst thing you can do; it would minimise your winnings when ahead and maximise your losses when behind.
I'd check call the river.
I don't see utg raising the turn with a set once a scare card hits.
I would have played this hand differently depending on the reads I had. If the raiser was a LAG I would have raised and maybe even went all in on the river. If he was a TAG, or I had no reads, I would have probably check called the river. Would my reraise on the river be too much against a 40/15/3 LAG? Because I'm starting to think I like two pair too much.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.