What should be my ITM/ROI goal single-tabling the $55?

[suited_ace]

I've been playing those for a week, so I don't have a decent sample size. Assuming I'm a pretty decent player, what should be my goal for ITM/ROI?

[skierdude1000]

go read the SNG faq like everyone else /images/graemlins/smile.gif

[dmmikkel]

1-tabling you will never know your true ROI anyway. No one really know their true ROI, but you will be even further away from it by 1-tabling =)

[suited_ace]

I read that, and I know Irieguy's post (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=2302700&page=&view=&sb=5& o=&vc=1) on the subject, but I assume those stats come from multi-tabling, right?

I should have a higher ITM/ROI by single-tabling, shouldn't I?

[skierdude1000]

[ QUOTE ]
1-tabling you will never know your true ROI anyway. No one really know their true ROI, but you will be even further away from it by 1-tabling =)

[/ QUOTE ]

Why is that?

[trdi]

Because you can never get a good sample size.

[dmmikkel]

Why is what?

He will never get to play enough to know his ROI. If he somehow do, the game will be totally different by then.

Variance is great even within 10k SNGs

[skierdude1000]

[ QUOTE ]
Because you can never get a good sample size.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think 100 SNGs single tabled are a good sample size. Multitabling makes it robot poker and you can't really play as good as you should be.

[raptor517]

good is 10/37. great is 15/38.5. holla

[dmmikkel]

100 sngs? I think variance has a tough lesson to teach you

[nate_king1]

What is your ROI Raptor.

[suited_ace]

[ QUOTE ]
good is 10/37. great is 15/38.5. holla

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmmm... Irieguy says it's 18, and that's prolly multi-tabling. And if I'm not mistaken you posted somewhere else your results for the $55s with a good sample size and a ~20% ROI. I don't think you were single-tabling, right?