Harmonica
06-12-2005, 04:51 PM
Hi
I have been reading quite a lot of press about these two, but the article below baffled me, because apparently the party ipo hasn't been well received in america for obvious reasons, but the empire online one has, does anyone know why this is?, because it is my understanding that empire online's business come's from marketing empire poker which we all know is a partypoker skin and this accounts for there biggest income source, so if those dumb fucks get there way and stop the american's from playing online then empire online would also be crippled by this action, so why the contrasting outlook?
web page (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2095-1650622,00.html)
I have been reading quite a lot of press about these two, but the article below baffled me, because apparently the party ipo hasn't been well received in america for obvious reasons, but the empire online one has, does anyone know why this is?, because it is my understanding that empire online's business come's from marketing empire poker which we all know is a partypoker skin and this accounts for there biggest income source, so if those dumb fucks get there way and stop the american's from playing online then empire online would also be crippled by this action, so why the contrasting outlook?
web page (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2095-1650622,00.html)