|
View Poll Results: Would you make the continuation bet in the AK example, when in late position and it is checked to yo | |||
Yes | 32 | 94.12% | |
No | 2 | 5.88% | |
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who wins this fight:
First match on the card: Donald Rumsfeld v. Ross Perot.
1. Ross Perot is not allowed to hire mercenaries to fight for him. 2. Ross Perot is not allowed to use bar charts or graphs in a tactical manner. He is allowed to show you, statistically, how he's going to whip Rumsfeld's pansy ass. 3. Rumsfeld may not conjure lightning bolts from his finger tips for this match. 4. Rumsfled may use his powers of confusion and deceit. 5. This match will be refereed by Judge Mills Lane. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who wins this fight:
Rumsfeld will win but he'll be mighty sore from getting kicked in the shins.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who wins this fight:
[ QUOTE ]
4. Rumsfled may use his powers of confusion and deceit. [/ QUOTE ] A pseudo-rummy dummy to confuse ross, then hit 'em with an IED |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who wins this fight:
can we somehow include Alan Greenspan in this?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who wins this fight:
[ QUOTE ]
can we somehow include Alan Greenspan in this? [/ QUOTE ] No. Alan Greenspan clearly wins this fight. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who wins this fight:
is this even considered a fair match?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who wins this fight:
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] can we somehow include Alan Greenspan in this? [/ QUOTE ] No. Alan Greenspan clearly wins this fight. [/ QUOTE ] darn. I was really looking forward to seeing his finishing move, the Irrational Exuberance. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who wins this fight:
[ QUOTE ]
darn. I was really looking forward to seeing his finishing move, the Irrational Exuberance. [/ QUOTE ] You're confusing that. The Irrational Exuberance is one of Greenspan's special moves. His finishing move is called "The Half Point Increase". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|