Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Poker > Omaha High

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2004, 05:32 PM
DougI DougI is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13
Default Why is there no NL Omaha?

My friends and I recently started playing Omaha to mix it up.
However, from looking at one or two internet sites, it doesn't appear that anyone plays Omaha in a NL format.
Can someone explain why this is so? or confirm whether NL Omaha does exist to some capacity at certain sites or B&M places?

I can only imagine that NL Omaha is non-existant because the game would get too out of control and strategy would go out the door, in favor of gambling on most hands.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2004, 05:41 PM
cielo cielo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

I do know that the local B&M (Hawaiian Gardens, CA) spreads a $100 buy in NL Omaha
game every day around 3 pm. I can't offer any evidence for the internet though.

Your idea of why no limit omaha may not exist reminds me of a thought by D. Sklansky in his "Tournament Poker for Advanced Players", I think it was when discussing his All-in pre-flop or fold "System", he talks about how he sees that as a strategic disadvantage of No Limit type games, however that was for tournaments not ring-games.

But what would make omaha more "out of control" potentially than NL hold'em? (honest question not smart-ass question that anticipates no reasonable responses)


cielo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2004, 05:57 PM
greywolf greywolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 128
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

the player with the temporary nuts tends to wanna overbet the pot enough to shut out all compertion.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2004, 07:03 PM
Atropos Atropos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 299
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

Yeah I think greywolf got it right. I remember reading in Ciaffones "Omaha Holdem - The Action Game" that pot-limit is the best structure for Omaha, because the opponents can be observed over multiple betting rounds, in nolimit nearly every hand would be an all-in fest from the flop on.
I personally believe, that the variance in pot-limit Omaha is already very huge, but making the game nolimit would make it a real variance hell. I mean the starting hands are so close in value, playing against a LAG preflop would be very tough, then going all-in on 53% shots on the flop wont help much too reduce variance.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2004, 07:08 PM
Iceman Iceman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 87
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

It's very common in Omaha for someone to have the absolute nuts, while it's very rare in holdem. If a holdem player massively overbets the pot, even if he has a strong hand he is taking a huge risk that someone will have one of the few hands that beats him (and in the rare case that the overbettor does have the absolute nuts, he'd probably want to play it in a way that would be more likely to attract action). In Omaha, even if you have the nuts on the flop or turn there are usually lots of cards on the next round that could potentially give someone a better hand. So in pot-limit Omaha, you're usually forced to bet out a strong hand in most situations because it would be too risky to give a free card. In no-limit Omaha, in most situations where you had the nuts you'd rather just go all-in (knowing that you can't be beaten) rather than face further action (which gives the drawing hands an even greater value than their pure odds would indicate since they have the opportunity to either bluff you or to get paid off on some of their outs), and that would eliminate much of the skill in the game (which revolves around how to respond to scare cards on the turn and river). In no-limit holdem, where strong drawing hands are much rarer so free cards aren't necessarily disasterous, it's often a difficult decision whether to bet out, check-raise, or slowplay a strong made hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2004, 12:28 AM
grandgnu grandgnu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pokah Is Nice, I Love Play Pokah (Chau Giang quote) Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 757
Default Re: PokerStars has NL Omaha

I play the pot limit varient, but there is also action on the NL tables for Omaha on Pokerstars. Have fun, I wouldn't play a NL variant of it, sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-21-2004, 12:59 AM
over_c over_c is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 88
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

I would like to mention that Ultimate Bet appears to have a $.10/$.25 NL Omaha Hi-Lo game. No one seems to be playing in it though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-21-2004, 01:33 AM
DougI DougI is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

My thinking is along the same lines as Iceman.
However, it does appear that PokerStars does offer it.
NL Omaha does seem to really take a lot out of the strategy of the game though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2004, 07:41 AM
MyMindIsGoing MyMindIsGoing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 41
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

Prima poker has omaha in NL format, both lowstakes ringgame and sng. They are wild but profitable.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-21-2004, 11:35 AM
6471849653 6471849653 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 108
Default Re: Why is there no NL Omaha?

One would need to get experience of it to know better. No-limit before the flop, no thanks. No-limit on the flop might be good in loose games; sometimes one can't even bet because there just are too many cards that will beat it on the turn, and the many callers get collectively good enough odds. I am not sure the overbetting on the flop is too big of a problem as if one overbets the nuts one gets action from overnuts and misses calls from players that are not getting the odds with a pot size bet. No-limit offers more variety, so basically more skill. Bad player overbetting the flop, you might not like that as you might rather get good implied odds to try to beat him. The same reasoning for preflop play; one might like to have the option of all-in, but one might not like to give that option to worse players, even though they will make mistakes there too. A very loose game would be better as no-limit, to pick the flop where one is a good favorite and figure to move more or less all-in.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.