horribly played hand, but easy fold on river?

[-Skeme-]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think your constantly-changing semantics and referring to a theoretical without explicit reference make your advice very hard to follow (at best) and very misleading (at worst).

[/ QUOTE ]

How is my advice misleading? I said exactly what I would do. You drew a conclusion to my reasoning behind the play, not me. If I wanted to represent the flush I'd say so. I said I'd maybe raise the flop, but defenitely raise the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

First statement: "I'd maybe raise the flop and absolutely raise the turn. I'd gun it hard on the turn"

My response: "You'd gun it hard to represent the flush?"

Your response: "No, I am referring to a theoretical situation that I have imagined in my head, and not the hand in question."

That is very misleading.

[/ QUOTE ]

Possibly to a complete idiot such as yourself. Go make some friends.

[poboy]

Where is the raise? You never once tried to define his hand which is the entire problem. At some point I think you have to try to get all your money in. JMO