Randy Jensen--Paul Philips Monte Carlo challenge

[Chaostracize]

No way man. Randy is the "Dream Crusher". I heard Mike Sexton himself say it.


I agre that one tournament won't mean anything though. I'm sure Paul would be just as inclined to play Randy heads up and declare the one-time winner as having the supreme playing strategy as do this.

Regardless, if Paul declines this challenge. All his dreams will be crushed!!!

[Vince Lepore]

[ QUOTE ]
Sklansky/Lepore Retirement Home for The Mathematically incompetent

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Jensen, did you put my name in here beacause you have a slime bucket personality or are you just a rude scumbag? Maybe both, who knows?

Lepore

[SCfuji]

i agree. better yet, why don't you and 9 other willing poker players pony up $5,000 and whomever wins or is the highest ranked on the "player of the year" award will get all the cash.

[Vince Lepore]

[ QUOTE ]
No way man. Randy is the "Dream Crusher".

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree! After all this Randy character ie THREE (3)(300 percent) times (x) (*) better than the average player! He da man!

Vince [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[MoreReady]

I think Paul should be forced to play the chicken in a tic-tac-toe game. If the chicken wins, he or she (is there a such a thing as a male chicken) gets a seat at the 2005 WSOP.

Paul if you read this...I enjoy your posts and blog.

Take it easy.

[Cooker]

Chickens are both male and female. Females are hens, males are roosters. They are all chickens.

[aaronjacobg]

POTY is just the WSOP. It is not a real thing, just a gimic for chevrolet or whatever type of car was sponsoring it.

Jake

[SCfuji]

we should create a forum for keeping track of how these players do at all the tournaments, big and small, and rank them... somehow.

[aaronjacobg]

I think that this is a good idea. It would greatly increase poster information and cut down on speculation. Maybe not a forum but just a chart. I'm terrible w/ technology and i am sure that much of this would take intense math but we know we got some math folks on here. So here's the idea. we make a formula for player ranking system taking into account size of tourny, quality of field, etc. and follow top pros as well as up and comers. I think i might make a separate post about this. Good idea.

Jake

[shaniac]

No offense, but this has got to be the lamest challenge ever.

I think your premise is way off, the fact that one tournament wouldn't be enough to prove anything notwithstanding.

I don't think Paul has ever claimed to be--or comes off as--a "math guy." If I missed something, please let me know. Just because he understands math doesn't mean he uses it as his primary path to tournament success.

Also, $100? Aren't you a big-ballin-gamblin-type-of-dude? Making it interesting man!

I haven't sifted through this entire thread yet, so forgive me if anything I said has already been covered.

Shane