Basing Decisions on Pot odds???

Hmm... This is kind of a difficult post to respond to. Don't be surprised if you get a lot of really mean, sarcastic responses. I would even consider deleting it.

You should look into the concept of hand ranges, and try to be more thorough when you're thinking of possible hands. [Most notably AK]

Don't you think that a 'tight aggressive' limp-caller will lead for pot with a much greater range than that stated, as well? Underpairs? Air?

[ QUOTE ]
Pocket AA, QQ, JJ, K,10 I almost can't win, but I'll be getting "the correct pot odds" to do so, How can pot odds factor into this decision without being so misleading? any ideas???

[/ QUOTE ]
Against AA, QQ, JJ, and KT, you don't have proper odds to call. You only have the proper odds because you assume that villain's range is significantly more broad.

I'm not sure the pot odds are misleading here. If you don't think there's at least a 33% chance of having the best hand here, you're either much too tight or villain is.

Merry Christmas.

[thatpfunk]

you raise to $10, get one caller and the pot is $95?

furthermore you say you are 19:1, 86:14. etc but are getting the correct 2:1 pot odds? wtf are you talking about?

[emil3000]

[ QUOTE ]
you raise to $10, get one caller and the pot is $95?


[/ QUOTE ]

I think he meant the BB is $10.

I said I raise 4 BB ($10) that means the BB is $10, and my raise was $40, one caller $80, the SB and BB is another $15, for a total of $95

19:1 is 95/5 or 95% AA 5% A-Q The AA are going to beat my hand 19 times out of 20 or they are winning 19 to 1

86/14 on the QQ is 86% favorite

2 to 1 on the pot odds is I have to call $95 to win $190, that's 2 to 1 on my money

Hope that clears it up

Thank you for the Merry Christmas wishes!

Yeah I think I'm 33% to win the pot, probably better in all honestly, but when I see two pair and I see the board, it's not an instacall because I have the pot odds.

I've heard some players tell me they knew they were beat but they had the right pot odds to call "so they had to" Nonsense!

I'm going to be evaluating factors like what was my opponent's betting preflop? if I'm at a B&M what was his reaction to the flop?

In this situation I would do more than just call, I'd raise and if he moved in on me, than I'd know he could have one of those hands that beats me silly like AA, QQ, JJ, K-10

All I'm trying to say is, pot odds is great for figuring how much to call on a draw, but when you have top pair or similiar you have to not only do the pot odds, but assume you know whether it's good or not, and you really don't have any idea, You'd use other factors like preflop betting, reactions, and most importantly you'd raise to find out where you are in the hand

Pot Odds is of little importance to me.

[MrFeelNothin]

[ QUOTE ]
Thank you for the Merry Christmas wishes!

Yeah I think I'm 33% to win the pot, probably better in all honestly, but when I see two pair and I see the board, it's not an instacall because I have the pot odds.


[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you for this enlightening observation. Maybe this is why I have lost $1,500 in 7 months while playing 30-40 hours a week. Truly a revelation.

I'm thinking of something that starts with an F and ends with a U, can you figure out

[MrFeelNothin]

Sorry for being an [censored] Thundercats. That was wrong and I apologize.


I guess what I meant to say is that your post would probably be better suited for the small stakes forum where the posters are still new to the game and would be able to learn with you. You are clearly missing some major poker concepts that are crucial to being a winning poker player.

GL, thinking about the game and putting in the effort is a huge first step that many players never make.

Mr. Feel Nothin,

Hey I respect that and thank you, no hard feelings,

I think you are right, I've played the occasional $2/$4 game but most of the time I'm not even playing $1/$2 more like 25 cent and 50cent so I should post in that forum. I came here with a hand that I lost $400 originally in a $1/$2 table, but I don't normally play at that level.

I think my question was a good one (or I just don't understand yet why it isn't) I saw Howard Lederer on FoxSports talking about this yesterday as a beginner's mistake, guy bets on a flush draw calling pot odds 2 to 1, but really he was only 4 to 1 to win so he should have folded.

I also think back to Rounders (though just a movie, it's applicable here) when Mike folds A,5 top two pair, because he knows Teddy KJB has the straight already, there's a perfect example of not calling even though with top two pair and Teddy's range of hands he'd be getting the correct pot odds to call.

My point was you can't ALWAYS call just because you have pot odds, especially in a tournament.

Thanks again, Mr. Feel Nothin,

and I'll take your suggestion to move to the Small Stakes forum