Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:09 PM
beerbandit beerbandit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 13 deep at Moe\'s
Posts: 156
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

[ QUOTE ]
how do you get past the flop in the first place? I didn't see the earlier action, did everyone check the flop?



[/ QUOTE ]

he checked it and other guy 67 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (not pham) bet and they both called


do not remember the bet size though
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:10 PM
Nick B. Nick B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 174
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

[ QUOTE ]
he checked it and other guy 67 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (not pham) bet and they both called


do not remember the bet size though

[/ QUOTE ]

The flop was checked around.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

For Tommy Reed's sanity I think it would have better if he had lost that KK vs. AA suckout against Lisandro, then he could have gone out before this 10s hand. Yeah I know he made some more money but now he's infamous.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:37 PM
beerbandit beerbandit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 13 deep at Moe\'s
Posts: 156
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
he checked it and other guy 67 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (not pham) bet and they both called


do not remember the bet size though

[/ QUOTE ]

The flop was checked around.

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry, scratch that last one
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:30 PM
SpeakEasy SpeakEasy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 51
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

You think the fold was bad? Failing to bet on the turn was an even bigger mistake than the fold.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 08-10-2005, 02:02 PM
gyndok gyndok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, texas
Posts: 36
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

[ QUOTE ]
Hey sirio-

On the relative scale of bad folds, how bad would you say the set of 10s fold was?

[/ QUOTE ]

JRB:

This is the only time you are gonna hear me say this, but that was a bad laydown...
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 08-10-2005, 02:06 PM
Vasquez Vasquez is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Grinding the 22\'s
Posts: 83
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

I guess he saw the coverage of phil h. folding kings so he figured he outdue him =]
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 08-10-2005, 03:05 PM
Phill S Phill S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nr Manchester, England
Posts: 255
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

Was 30K a min bet?

If so scratch my thoughts, i figured the bet was larger in relation to the pot itself.

Phill
ps, still not the worst fold ever, but not great, ill agree there.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 08-10-2005, 03:50 PM
ohkanada ohkanada is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,325
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

That is a silly statement.

Folding was much worse then giving a free card.

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 08-10-2005, 03:57 PM
ohkanada ohkanada is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,325
Default Re: tommy reed, set of 10\'s

Another silly statement. If he loses the KK vs AA hand I believe he ends up in 9th with 32k. Instead he took 5th for nearly 99k. He made a very bad fold, but I think he can live with the extra 70k.

Ken
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.