Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 11-06-2005, 07:36 AM
pokergrader pokergrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 210
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

AK v AK v JJ
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 11-06-2005, 10:35 AM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

So I'm playing AA, KK, QQ, AK, maybe AQ, and maybe KQ. What are you guys limping with versus what are you guys raising with, and from what position?
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 11-06-2005, 12:19 PM
Boolean Boolean is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

I'd definately play both AQ and KQ, I just forgot to include it as I was pretty tired. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 11-06-2005, 12:22 PM
Boolean Boolean is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

I sometimes raise with AA, sometimes not. I sometimes raise with KK, sometimes not. I sometimes raise with AK, sometimes not. AQ and KQ, I usually limp with. The reason I don't raise all of my top hands is for deception purposes. This of course assumes the people in your game generally know how to play. As far as position goes, has anyone found if position really affects play here? I've found either you flop a good hand/draw, or you fold regardless of position.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 11-06-2005, 12:25 PM
Boolean Boolean is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

Here's a question. Since this game plays so soft, for the time being anyhow, what kind of bankroll would you assume is needed for this game? From what I've seen, as long as you know how to get away from a hand and how to push your big edges, the low swings are few and far between. I could be running hot, however. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 11-06-2005, 12:37 PM
Mason Hellmuth Mason Hellmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 164
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
This of course assumes the people in your game generally know how to play.

[/ QUOTE ]
Terrible assumption. Do you see why? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 11-06-2005, 01:19 PM
jwesty5 jwesty5 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
I sometimes raise with AA, sometimes not. I sometimes raise with KK, sometimes not. I sometimes raise with AK, sometimes not. AQ and KQ, I usually limp with. The reason I don't raise all of my top hands is for deception purposes. This of course assumes the people in your game generally know how to play. As far as position goes, has anyone found if position really affects play here? I've found either you flop a good hand/draw, or you fold regardless of position.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think position really matters much. Like you said typically your either flopping top two or a set or your folding your hand.

Do you really think the people playing these games notice what you raising with? I've found theres usually one or two people playing who don't even know their playing Royal Holdem.

I raise with AA, AK, KK 100% of the time and dont think anybody even notices.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 11-06-2005, 01:40 PM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I sometimes raise with AA, sometimes not. I sometimes raise with KK, sometimes not. I sometimes raise with AK, sometimes not. AQ and KQ, I usually limp with. The reason I don't raise all of my top hands is for deception purposes. This of course assumes the people in your game generally know how to play. As far as position goes, has anyone found if position really affects play here? I've found either you flop a good hand/draw, or you fold regardless of position.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think position really matters much. Like you said typically your either flopping top two or a set or your folding your hand.

Do you really think the people playing these games notice what you raising with? I've found theres usually one or two people playing who don't even know their playing Royal Holdem.

I raise with AA, AK, KK 100% of the time and dont think anybody even notices.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just had my first royal flush burn someone's four of a kind. This is a fun game.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:08 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

Just think how sick this will be if they spread NL. Straights calling all ins on the turn with the 'nuts'.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:15 PM
IggyWH IggyWH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh - FIESTA BOWL BITCHES!
Posts: 317
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
Just think how sick this will be if they spread NL. Straights calling all ins on the turn with the 'nuts'.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think this game would be good NL. The swings that can happen from turn to river are just too huge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.