|
|
#11
08-25-2005, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Kinda like that poll question everyone\'s been yellin about
This is not a rational reason to fold.
Original raiser could fold K10, and leave you dominating AQ. Original raiser could call with 1010 and co have JJ. You cant fold here think that you have less than six outs, that information is not going to be accurate. You have to determine a range of hands and figure what equity you have in this pot. I can't see that you dont have enough equity to call this , given the position of the action. If the action came from UTG and UTG+1 from rocks, yeah I would be aliitle worried. But in this case it is a clear call. 
|
|
#12
08-25-2005, 07:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Kinda like that poll question everyone\'s been yellin about
[ QUOTE ]
This is not a rational reason to fold. Original raiser could fold K10, and leave you dominating AQ. Original raiser could call with 1010 and co have JJ. You cant fold here think that you have less than six outs, that information is not going to be accurate. You have to determine a range of hands and figure what equity you have in this pot. I can't see that you dont have enough equity to call this , given the position of the action. If the action came from UTG and UTG+1 from rocks, yeah I would be aliitle worried. But in this case it is a clear call. [/ QUOTE ] If they have JJ and TT, I'm roughly 38% to win, and was what I originally said was exactly what I was afraid of. Getting a little better than even money really doesn't justify calling with 11.5 bbs at this stage, especially given how I believe I am better than the table, am in LP (so I wont have to pay a blind for a while). I'm realizing now it was a bad fold, but I think 90% of the reason is that I was wrong to assume OR would fold.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
