Hmm, what do you think? Roulette related

[Dudd]

[ QUOTE ]
You must be so self absorbed to think I even care about your slander. Thanks for deterring a sincere post. Do you treat all the new people like this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just those who think they can beat roullete.

[PokerCat69]

Systems that have you bet based on previous spin outcomes will not win. Nor will any fancy progression.

Roulette has been beaten with the use of a computer that can project where the ball will land. This is cheating of course.
What has me interested is I've heard some people can predict where the ball is going to land without using a computer.

[Terry]

If you are not the creator of this scam it is a great coincidence that the affiliate link to casino download #2 is so similar to your newly created name here.

You just want people to click on your affiliate links, right? And the “system” is just your scumbag way of advertising, right?

[SamIAm]

[ QUOTE ]
a simple martingale-like approach where you bet ... and every time you lose you increase you bet enough to offset your loss

[/ QUOTE ]It's a shame that 2+2 thinks "Martingale" means "Double your bet to offset your loss". It'd be like if I used "Card Game" to always mean "Crazy Pineapple Hi/Lo with a Full Kill".

Mathworld.
-Sam

[SheetWise]

[ QUOTE ]
It's a shame that 2+2 thinks "Martingale" means "Double your bet to offset your loss".

[/ QUOTE ]
In betting systems, that's what it means. Because the poster you're responding to was not doubling, he wrote "martingale-like".

You can use the term "Card Game" to always mean "Crazy Pineapple Hi/Lo with a Full Kill" when you use it in a context where you can logically assume that everyone knows what you mean.