|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sets vs. Continuous
Continuous is my preference. The most I have played straight is 78 and that was 10 tabling. I felt awesome after that [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. I'll see if I can beat that tomorrow.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sets vs. Continuous
Ten tabling in sets is perfect for me. Early and late play is so brainless that I can watch TV or talk on the phone or do homework or something, only really playing intense poker for maybe 10 minutes each set. If I played continuously, all of my games would be at varying stages, and I would have to have a certain portion of my attention consistently devoted across the span of an hour rather than letting it fluctuating in waves. This works for me because I have a short attention span. Also, I rarely have a solid 3-4 hour block of time that I can devote to poker. I have to squeeze in a set here and there to get my 20 hrs/wk.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sets vs. Continuous
if im pumped and really concentrating, ill 8-table a set of 8. if im feeling anything but 100%, ill 4-table continuously until i finish 8.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sets vs. Continuous
[ QUOTE ]
if im pumped and really concentrating, ill 8-table a set of 8. [/ QUOTE ] brought to you by the department of redundancy department [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sets vs. Continuous
[ QUOTE ]
brought to you by the department of redundancy department [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] in case you didnt catch that, its 8-tabling a set of 8 tables in a set of 8. |
|
|