|
|
|
|
#2
12-30-2005, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If you could play poker right maybe your AA wouldn't lose to 83o. Any good player isn't going to lose with such a good hand to such a bad one. [/ QUOTE ] Don't you want to be up against 83o with AA? How can you control it when you do lose? Just don't understand what your saying. [/ QUOTE ] Of course you do, but a good player uses his skill to win with AA against that 83o at showdown. A player with his full arsenal of strategies and tactics should never lose when the cards give him such a giant advantage. [/ QUOTE ] You have to rapidly press the corresponding punch and kick buttons and rotate the controller counterclockwise to get extra hits from your AA supercombo. 
|
|
#4
12-31-2005, 02:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
If you assume this thread is about all in suckouts from preflop all in situations, then you cant control losing with way better hands than your opponent(s). Just like in the bad beat forum where I posted my aces losing to a 1 outer on the river against 2 opponents, after calling THEIR all ins preflop. I geuss you're saying that because I lost I'm not good enough of a player to win with AA?
|
|
#5
12-31-2005, 02:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
Sounds like your game needs some work if you lost that hand.
|
|
#6
12-31-2005, 03:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
Sorry ORT, but I'm going to have to agree with Softcore on this one. One of the sure-fire signs of a soft table that I look for when I first sit down is players calling multiple all-ins with AA.
/mc
|
|
#7
12-31-2005, 05:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
"If you assume this thread is about all in suckouts from preflop all in situations, then you cant control losing with way better hands than your opponent(s). Just like in the bad beat forum where I posted my aces losing to a 1 outer on the river against 2 opponents, after calling THEIR all ins preflop. I geuss you're saying that because I lost I'm not good enough of a player to win with AA?"
Technically you are right, but I'd gather you are too stupid to ever be a very good poker player. -Michael
|
|
#8
12-31-2005, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
[ QUOTE ]
A player with his full arsenal of strategies and tactics should never lose when the cards give him such a giant advantage. [/ QUOTE ] You can't never say 'never'. Playing with skill will lessen the chances of an 86% favorite going down the pooper...but that 14% can't possibly be reduced to 0%
|
|
#9
12-30-2005, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
[ QUOTE ]
You are incorrect, the suckout level is normal. If you could play poker right maybe your AA wouldn't lose to 83o. Any good player isn't going to lose with such a good hand to such a bad one. [/ QUOTE ] youre not talking to me, are you? [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
|
|
#10
12-31-2005, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts?
[ QUOTE ]
Is Full Tilt the worst site for Suckouts? [/ QUOTE ] No way. It's the BEST site for suck-outs. I think Party and Stars have their work cut out for them as I haven't been winning via the suck-out nearly as much on those sites. But full-tilt got it right!! Party and Stars need to change their RNG to correctly keep up with the suck-out ratio at Full Tilt.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
