Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-20-2005, 07:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JJ on river A vs two passives. Anyone value bet here?

[ QUOTE ]
A lower pair.

Most players will lead an ace on the river if they have AQ or AK.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously? Don't you think they would be betting that flop if they had 99-KK? Even passive players know to bet with overpairs. And not a lot of people raise 77 or lower UTG+2. I think A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] is very likely here, and they may not bet their one pair because they are scared of the flush or a higher kicker. If you can fold when check/raised, you need to be good somewhat more than 33% of the time, since it's not real likely that both will call this river, and I'm really not sure you are.

Certainly not betting this isn't a giant leak, like someone stated. It's certainly a bigger leak to misplay this by bet/folding a winner or bet/calling when behind. I'd want a good read on my opponents to consider betting this.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-20-2005, 10:15 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JJ on river A vs two passives. Anyone value bet here?

[ QUOTE ]

You have much flawed logic my friend. I'm afraid you don't have much of an understanding of typical Party players. In your "Hands we're ahead of that call," you have to include almost any pair. This is a clear easy value bet, and it's not even close.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree it’s not even close, betting is clearly wrong here. When we assign our opponents hands based on basic hand reading skills it is blatantly obvious we are not ahead ~35% of the time.

"You have to include any pair" A loose/passive opponent is never raising 22-88 (even 99 is very questionable) pf from UTG. It seems like you're conveniently forgetting the preflop raise. I believe my possible holdings analysis is quite accurate, and you have given me no reason to believe otherwise.

In my opinion, this is a very clear check.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-20-2005, 10:23 PM
HajiShirazu HajiShirazu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 414
Default Re: JJ on river A vs two passives. Anyone value bet here?

I think betting is absolutely crazy. You would have to be against the two worst players in the world for a bet here to have value. Anybody who has played holdem for more than a couple of weeks automatically puts the 3 bettor on an ace or a big pair, the ace was the worst card in the world as crappy pairs probably will not call. Meanwhile an ace is an extremely likely hand for your opponents to have (in fact if I had to put UTG+2 on a hand, Ax would be it.)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-20-2005, 10:42 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JJ on river A vs two passives. Anyone value bet here?

While we will be called by worse hands here, i.e. 99, TT, pair of 8s, I think it's important to note that our opponents will not hold these hands enough times to justify betting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.