Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2005, 12:25 AM
HavanaBanana HavanaBanana is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,332
Default Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

As we speak 70k Stars vs 68k Party.

nh

ToT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2005, 12:33 AM
imported_leader imported_leader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 510
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

good
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2005, 12:34 AM
obsidian obsidian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 343
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

As we speak:

$10/20
party - ~60 games
stars - 10

$15/30
party - 25
stars - 4

$20/40
party - 25
stars - 0

$30/60
party - 23
stars - 7

No, not yet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2005, 12:43 AM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

[ QUOTE ]
As we speak:

$10/20
party - ~60 games
stars - 10

$15/30
party - 25
stars - 4

$20/40
party - 25
stars - 0

$30/60
party - 23
stars - 7

No, not yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is because they do not reward mid/high limit players well enough.

Hint to Lee: double FPP for $3 raked hands, you need more mid/high limit players.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2005, 12:45 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

[ QUOTE ]


Hint to Lee: double FPP for $3 raked hands, you need more mid/high limit players.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2005, 02:58 AM
kiddj kiddj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 221
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Hint to Lee: double FPP for $3 raked hands, you need more mid/high limit players.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
Actually... don't you need more fish?

I'm not saying there are none, but there could always be a little more. Am i right, or am i right... or am i right???? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-29-2005, 09:11 AM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Hint to Lee: double FPP for $3 raked hands, you need more mid/high limit players.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
Actually... don't you need more fish?

I'm not saying there are none, but there could always be a little more. Am i right, or am i right... or am i right???? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

This will attract fish as much as it will attract sharks. Quicker to get that TV etc..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2005, 08:19 PM
Shoe Shoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mil-town
Posts: 98
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Hint to Lee: double FPP for $3 raked hands, you need more mid/high limit players.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually... they need to do something at $2 rake too. I think they should go by Full Tilt's example, and give 1 FPP per $1 in rake,thus $2 rake = 2 FPP's and $3 rake = 3 FPP's. The VIP bonus should be calculate after that.

Lots of time's I am playing at a 6 max table with less than 6 players on it, so the rake gets capped at $2. So I shouldn't be punished for the situations where rake cannot reach $3.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2005, 08:36 PM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 66
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

Currently 1,640 active real money Party Hold'em tables vs. 876 Pokerstars.

1522 tourney tables at Party vs. 1357 Pokerstars.

They are very close in tourney play, but Party still dominates the ring games.

Source: www.whichpoker.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-29-2005, 11:06 PM
Timer Timer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 128
Default Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

[ QUOTE ]
Lots of time's I am playing at a 6 max table with less than 6 players on it, so the rake gets capped at $2. So I shouldn't be punished for the situations where rake cannot reach $3.


[/ QUOTE ]

You might want to rethink this last sentence.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.