|
|
|
|
#1
11-30-2005, 09:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($60) Two pair, meh
one way: if by betting 300 on the turn he raises big with a straight and you can fold saving 200 from what you then had to call on the river after you check.
Pat 
|
|
#2
11-30-2005, 10:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($60) Two pair, meh
I would have played it the same probably folding to river bet like 2/3 times without any reads. The way it was played we got to see our FH outs on the river for a chance to stack a 6 or induce a bet from a hand we have beat, and as it happened he fired an above avg. amount imo but a lot of the times the bet will be more like 350 so we get to showdown with the same chips lost as the turn bet option. Also if villain is sneaky at all he could c/r turn with less than a 6 forcing us to make a big mistake folding.
|
|
#3
12-01-2005, 12:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($60) Two pair, meh
Also if villain is sneaky at all he could c/r turn with less than a 6 forcing us to make a big mistake folding.
This reasoning is nulled by the fact that he could do the same thing on the river, where, actually, its probably more effective.
|
|
#4
12-01-2005, 01:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($60) Two pair, meh
[ QUOTE ]
Also if villain is sneaky at all he could c/r turn with less than a 6 forcing us to make a big mistake folding. This reasoning is nulled by the fact that he could do the same thing on the river, where, actually, its probably more effective. [/ QUOTE ] No it isn't, because I check behind here 100% of the time.
|
|
#5
12-01-2005, 01:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($60) Two pair, meh
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also if villain is sneaky at all he could c/r turn with less than a 6 forcing us to make a big mistake folding. This reasoning is nulled by the fact that he could do the same thing on the river, where, actually, its probably more effective. [/ QUOTE ] No it isn't, because I check behind here 100% of the time. [/ QUOTE ] good point [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
