Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2005, 02:22 PM
KaiShin KaiShin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: thanks for all the fish
Posts: 1,195
Default QQ vs. complete passive

Game is Cryptologic $1/$2. Table is mostly tight/passive, with UTG here being the most passive of the bunch.

Preflop: Hero has Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] in LMP
UTG calls, 4 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises</font>, 4 folds, UTG calls.

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls.

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls.

I figure I would fold to a CR here, but it never came, so I assumed a draw or K-low.

River: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls.

Wasn't sure about this river bet, but no draws seemed to hit, so I bet it for value thinking he paired his 10 on the flop.

Final pot 14.75BB

Results in white below:
<font color="white">Hero shows two pair, queens and fives.
UTG shows two pair, aces and fives(6c As).</font>

Thoughts about the river or anything else?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2005, 02:33 PM
tiltaholic tiltaholic is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: QQ vs. complete passive

standard.
shouldn't the results be two pair?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2005, 02:35 PM
KaiShin KaiShin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: thanks for all the fish
Posts: 1,195
Default Re: QQ vs. complete passive

[ QUOTE ]
standard.
shouldn't the results be two pair?

[/ QUOTE ]
Er, yeah. Duh.

I was just afraid I was being too aggresive vs. a complete passive player. I mean, I sat there for an hour and he didn't raise a single hand. I know that means I'm gaining even when I lose the pot, but still, its kinda annoying [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2005, 02:53 PM
tiltaholic tiltaholic is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: QQ vs. complete passive

yeah, it's annoying. but people like that are your friend.
far more often than not you win this hand outright.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.